green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Stine v. United States
See Black v. United States, 28 Fed.Cl. 177, 184 (1993) (upholding correction board’s decision finding that there was “no credible evidence” supporting the DVA’s diagnosis), aff 'd per curiam 16 F.3d 421 , 1993 WL 514381 (Fed.Cir.1993) (unpublished table decision).
discussed
Cited "see"
Milas v. United States
See Black v. United States, 28 Fed.Cl. 177, 186, aff'd, 16 F.3d 421 (Fed.Cir.1993) (“Although plaintiff seeks money damages against the United States based on statutory grounds, the Due Process Clause does not provide an additional cause of action,” hence no jurisdiction over claimed violation of “due process right to cross-examine and confront adverse witnesses”); Yount v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 372 , 379 n. 8 (1991), aff'd, 985 F.2d 583 (Fed.Cir.1992) (“it is well established that the court lacks jurisdiction to consider due process claims based on the fifth or fourteenth amendme…
cited
Cited "see"
Wright v. United States
See Black v. United States, 28 Fed.Cl. 177, 186 , aff'd, 16 F.3d 421 (Fed.Cir.1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Erskine B. Bowles, Administrator, Small Business Administration
v.
Sheila Widnall, Secretary of the Air Force
v.
Sheila Widnall, Secretary of the Air Force
94-1037.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Dec 15, 1993.
Published
16 F.3d 421
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Erskine B. BOWLES, Administrator, Small Business
Administration, Appellant,
v.
Sheila WIDNALL, Secretary of the Air Force, Appellee.
No. 94-1037.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Dec. 15, 1993.
1
DISMISSED.
ORDER
The parties having so agreed, it is
2
ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).