green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Chhim v. University of Houston Clear Lake
(2×)
Sept. 20, 2011) (Harmon, J.) [Doc. # 55] (dismissing claims after a bench trial based on findings of fact and conclusions); Chhim v. City of Houston, 168 F.3d 486 , 1999 WL 25063, at *1 (5th Cir. Jan. 11, 1999) (per curiam) (unpublished) (affirming dismissal of Chhim’s employment discrimination claims); Chhim v. City of Houston, Civ.
cited
Cited "see"
Roto-Rooter Corporation v. Garcia
See Playboy Enters., Inc. v. Webbworld, Inc., 991 F.Supp. 543, 561 (N.D.Tex.1997), (citations omitted) aff’d, 168 F.3d 486 (5th Cir.1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
ADT, LLC v. Capital Connect, Inc.
See Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Webbworld, Inc., 991 F.Supp. 543, 553-54 (N.D.Tex.1997) (Sanders, J.) (holding an employer liable for an employee’s infringe ment where the former had supervisory authority over the latter’s activities), aff'd, 168 F.3d 486 (5th Cir.1999). f.
discussed
Cited "see"
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Tex Border Management, Inc.
See Playboy Enter., Inc. v. Webbworld, Inc., 991 F.Supp. 543, 562 (N.D.Tex.1997) (“[The plaintiff] did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that [the individual defendant] should be held liable for vicarious copyright infringement”), aff'd, 168 F.3d 486 (5th Cir.1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arista Records LLC v. Usenet. Com, Inc.
See Playboy Enter., Inc. v. Webbworld, Inc., 991 F.Supp. 543, 552-53 (N.D.Tex.1997), aff'd without opinion, 168 F.3d 486 (5th Cir.1999). *158 As a primary defense to vicarious infringement liability, Defendants rely on the same defense under Sony’s “staple article of commerce” doctrine as formed the basis of their defense to Plaintiffs’ contributory infringement claim.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward John Johnston, Iii, Also Known as Easy, Also Known as Ez, Also Known as Charles Edward Johnson, III
See United States v. Brierton, 168 F.3d 486 , No. 98-10382 (5th Cir. Jan.12, 1999) (unpublished) (concluding that § 2255 motions are distinct from ha-beas petitions, precluding application of the Suspension Clause); see also Turner v. Johnson, 177 F.3d 390 , 392 & n. 1 (5th Cir.) (finding in dicta Brierton to be persuasive), cer t. denied, 528 U.S. 1007 , 120 S.Ct. 504 , 145 L.Ed.2d 389 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Adrian Roberts v. State
Id. §§ 502.041(b), .046 (West 2013), § 601.051 (West 2011) (providing for the requirement of financial responsibility under the Texas Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act); see also Maride v. Biggerstaff, 10 F.Supp.2d 705, 707 (N.D.Tex. 1998) (stating that the Texas Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act is a facially valid exercise of the State’s inherent police power), aff'd, 168 F.3d 486 (5th Cir.1999).
Chhim
v.
The City of Houston
v.
The City of Houston
97-20813.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jan 12, 1999.
Cited by 1 opinion | Unpublished
Chhim
v.
City of Houston[*]
NO. 97-20813
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
January 11, 1999
1
Appeal From: S.D.Tex.
2
Affirmed.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34-2