neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.3 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PEMCO AEROPLEX, INC., a Subsidiary of Precision Standard Company, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
v.
PEMCO AEROPLEX, INC., a Subsidiary of Precision Standard Company, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
97-6910.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Jul 6, 1999.
G. Douglas Jones, U.S. Atty., James G-Gann, III, Shirley I. McCarty, Asst. U.S. Attys., Birmingham, AL, Irene M. Solet, Douglas N. Letter, App. Staff, Civil Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant., William F. Pendergast, G. Matthew Koehl, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.
Anderson, Tjoflat, Edmondson, Cox, Birch, Dubina, Black, Carnes, Barkett, Hull, Marcus.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard, by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.