Halray Harman,plaintiff-Appellant v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Comm'r Order & of the Soc. Sec. Amended Admin.,opinion, 203 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Halray Harman,plaintiff-Appellant v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Comm'r Order & of the Soc. Sec. Amended Admin.,opinion, 203 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Adamson v. Barnhart (ca9, 2002-06-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Adamson v. Barnhart
9th Cir. · 2002 · confidence medium
We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s decision to remand to the ALJ for further proceedings rather than for payment of benefits, Harman v. Apfel, 203 F.3d 1151, 1155 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Mendoza v. Apfel
C.D. Cal. · 2000 · confidence medium
Harman v. Apfel, 203 F.3d 1151, 1158-59 (9th Cir.2000); Reddick , 157 F. F.2d at 365 (“Benefits wrongfully terminated should be reinstated without further agency proceedings.”).
cited Cited "see" Linnie Nelson v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security
7th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at 1156 n. 5.
cited Cited "see" Nelson, Linnie v. Apfel, Kenneth S.
7th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at 1156 n.5.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Halray Harman,plaintiff-Appellant
v.
Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner Order and of the Social Security Amended Administration,opinion
98-35780.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
May 4, 2000.
203 F.3d 1151
Published

203 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2000)

HALRAY HARMAN,Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner ORDER AND of the Social Security AMENDED Administration,OPINION Defendant-Appellee.

No. 98-35780

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Argued and Submitted May 6, 1999
Filed February 17, 2000
Amended May 4, 2000

1

NOTE: SEE AMENDED OPINION AT 211 F.3d 1172.