Fed. Data Corp. v. Janet Reno, Attorney Gen. Dep't of Just., 22 F.3d 1104 (Fed. Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Fed. Data Corp. v. Janet Reno, Attorney Gen. Dep't of Just., 22 F.3d 1104 (Fed. Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“even where activities suggest some difficulty 23 functioning, they may be grounds for discrediting the claimant's testimony to the extent 24 that they contradict claims of a totally debilitating impairment”
61 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Carlisle v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (azd, 2025-02-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Carlisle v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
D. Ariz. · 2025 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
even where activities suggest some difficulty 23 functioning, they may be grounds for discrediting the claimant's testimony to the extent 24 that they contradict claims of a totally debilitating impairment
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Cynthia L. Andrews v. Martin J. OMalley
C.D. Cal. · 2025 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the alj may consider 23 inconsistencies in the claimant's testimony or between the 24 testimony and the claimant's conduct
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Pamela Jean Degler v. Kilolo Kijakazi
C.D. Cal. · 2021 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
even when the evidence is susceptible to more than 23 one rational interpretation, we must uphold the alj's findings if they are supported 24 by inferences reasonably drawn from the record.
discussed Cited "see" Strojnik v. State Bar of Arizona
D. Ariz. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pistor v. Garcia, 791 22 F.3d 1104 , 1111 (9th Cir. 2015) (holding that once a defendant has asserted sovereign 23 immunity pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), “‘the party asserting subject matter jurisdiction has 24 the burden of proving its existence,’ i.e. that immunity does not bar the suit.”) (quoting 25 Miller v. Wright, 705 F.3d 919, 923 (9th Cir. 2013)).
cited Cited "see" Joyce Moore v. Department of Veterans Affairs
MSPB · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dolezal v. Department of the Army, 58 M.S.P.R. 64 , 69 (1993), aff’d, 22 F.3d 1104 (Fed.
cited Cited "see" Guy W. Hall v. Defense Logistics Agency
Fed. Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Romero v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm'n, 55 M.S.P.R. 527 , 535, reh'g denied, 58 M.S.P.R. 259 (1992), aff'd, 22 F.3d 1104 (Fed.Cir.1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Federal Data Corporation
v.
Janet Reno, Attorney General Department of Justice
93-1454.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Mar 14, 1994.
22 F.3d 1104
Published
3 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 92%
Citer courts: C.D. California (2) · D. Arizona (1)

22 F.3d 1104
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

FEDERAL DATA CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
Janet RENO, Attorney General Department of Justice, Appellee.

No. 93-1454.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 14, 1994.

Before MICHEL, CLEVENGER and SCHALL, Circuit Judges:

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

1

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.