Anthony Grandison v. Sewall Smith, Warden Theodore Purnell, Chief of Sec. Arnold Turner Alvin Wooden, 25 F.3d 1039 (4th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Anthony Grandison v. Sewall Smith, Warden Theodore Purnell, Chief of Sec. Arnold Turner Alvin Wooden, 25 F.3d 1039 (4th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“assertion of excessive force is not premised solely 26 on the pointed weapons but also on the fact that she was held at gunpoint while she was otherwise 27 restrained .”
55 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Paredes v. City of San Jose (cand, 2024-12-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Paredes v. City of San Jose
N.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
assertion of excessive force is not premised solely 26 on the pointed weapons but also on the fact that she was held at gunpoint while she was otherwise 27 restrained .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Besson v. Sethi
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · confidence medium
See 20 Leite v. Crane Co., 749 F.3d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir. 2014); Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer, 373 21 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th Cir. 2004). 22 When a defendant makes a factual challenge “by presenting affidavits or other evidence 23 properly brought before the court, the party opposing the motion must furnish affidavits or other 24 evidence necessary to satisfy its burden of establishing subject matter jurisdiction.” Safe Air, 373 25 F.3d at 1039; see Leite, 749 F.3d at 1121 . 26 //// 27 2 The Court previously advised pro se Plaintiff of the requirement to file any opposition within fourteen (…
discussed Cited "see" Anthony Bouyer v. Rockys Racquet World
C.D. Cal. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Safe Air for Everyone, 373 25 F.3d at 1039 (“[J]urisdiction and the merits of an 26 action are intertwined where ‘a statute provides the 27 basis for both the subject matter jurisdiction of the 28 federal court and the plaintiff’s substantive claim for 1 relief.’” (quoting Sun Valley Gasoline, Inc. v. Ernst 2 Enters., Inc., 711 F.2d 138, 139 (9th Cir. 1983))). 3 Because the jurisdictional inquiry is coextensive with 4 the merits of Plaintiff’s ADA claim, dismissal for lack 5 of subject matter jurisdiction is proper only if the 6 allegations in the Complaint are controverted by …
discussed Cited "see" Focus on the Family v. Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority
11th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Goldstein v. Chestnut Ridge Volunteer Fire Co., 25 F.3d 1039 (4th Cir.1994) (table disposition) (holding that the state action determination turned on unresolved factual questions, and that summary judgment consequently was inappropriate); Gibson v. City of Chicago, 910 F.2d 1510, 1517 (7th Cir.1990) (“[T]he essential inquiry [at the summary judgment stage] becomes whether [the plaintiff] has created a triable issue of fact concerning whether [the officer’s] actions related in some way to the performance of a police duty.”); Layne v. Sampley, 627 F.2d 12,13 (6th Cir.1980) (…
discussed Cited "see" Watkins v. Sverdrup Technology
11th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Fisher v. Asheville- Buncombe Technical College, 857 F. Supp. 465, 470 (W.D.N.C. 1993), aff’d, 25 F.3d 1039 (4th Cir. 1994) (per curiam). 12 compare similarly situated individuals and failed to eliminate nondiscriminatory reasons for the numerical disparities”), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 684 (1997); see generally Barnes v. Southwest Forest Indust., Inc., 814 F.2d 607, 608, 610 (11th Cir. 1987) (finding insufficient circumstantial evidence to support a prima facie case of failing to retain or rehire on the basis of age, even though employer discharged fourteen security guards i…
cited Cited "see" Watkins v. Sverdrup Technology
11th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Fisher v. Asheville-Buncombe Technical College, 857 F.Supp. 465, 470 (W.D.N.C.1993), aff'd, 25 F.3d 1039 (4th Cir.1994) (per curiam ). 10 employees similarly situated to themselves.
cited Cited "see" William O. WATKINS, William R. Mallory, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SVERDRUP TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant-Appellee
11th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Fisher v. Asheville-Buncombe Technical College, 857 F.Supp. 465, 470 (W.D.N.C.1993), aff'd, 25 F.3d 1039 (4th Cir.1994) (per curiam). 17 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Whitaker v. Nick The Greek Santa Clara LLC
N.D. Cal. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cal. Apr. 21, 2022); see also D’Lil, 538 25 F.3d at 1039–40. 26 Defendant urges the Court to require Plaintiff to plead additional elements to establish 27 injunctive relief standing, as some other district courts in the Ninth Circuit have in ADA cases.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mark v. Borough of Hatboro
3rd Cir. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Goldstein v. Chestnut Ridge Volunteer Fire Co., 25 F.3d 1039 (table), 1994 WL 233356 (4th Cir.1994) (question of whether fire-fighting is traditionally exclusive government function in Maryland is question of fact); Haavistola, 6 F.3d at 218 (same); Yeager v. City of McGregor, 980 F.2d 337, 340-43 (5th Cir.1993) (volunteer fire company in Texas not state actor), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 79 , 126 L.Ed.2d 47 (1993), Janusaitis v. Middlebury Volunteer Fire Dep't, 607 F.2d 17, 23 (2d Cir.1979) (volunteer fire department in Connecticut state actor); Versarge v. Township of …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mark v. Borough of Hatboro (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Goldstein v. Chestnut Ridge Volunteer Fire Co., 25 F.3d 1039 (table), 1994 WL 233356 (4th Cir. 1994) (question of whether fire fighting is traditionally exclusive government function in Maryland is question of fact); Haavistola, 6 F.3d at 218 (same); Yeager, 980 F.2d at 340-43 (volunteer fire company in Texas not state actor); Janusaitis v. Middlebury Volunteer Fire Dep't, 607 F.2d 17, 23 (2d Cir. 1979) (volunteer fire department in Connecticut state actor); Versarge v. Township of Clinton, No. 90-257, 1991 WL 247611 at *4 (D.N.J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anthony Grandison
v.
Sewall Smith, Warden Theodore Purnell, Chief of Security Arnold Turner Alvin Wooden
94-6128.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
May 19, 1994.
25 F.3d 1039
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 63%
Citer courts: N.D. California (1)

25 F.3d 1039
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Anthony GRANDISON, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Sewall SMITH, Warden; Theodore Purnell, Chief of Security;
Arnold Turner; Alvin Wooden, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6128.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 21, 1994.
Decided: May 19, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-93-494-B)

Anthony Grandison, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J. S. Carrion, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Grandison v. Smith, CA-93-494-B (D. Md. Dec. 30, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED