Michael Akins Betty Akins v. Ronald J. Rodriguez, Am. Nuclear Insurers, Inc., 26 F.3d 105 (9th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Michael Akins Betty Akins v. Ronald J. Rodriguez, Am. Nuclear Insurers, Inc., 26 F.3d 105 (9th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
75 citation events (30 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Thompson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (ca10, 1994-10-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Thompson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
10th Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470 2 See Adair v. Commissioner, No. 92-70812, 1994 WL 266121 (9th Cir. June 15, 1994) (unpublished opinion) 3 See Dufresne v. Commissioner, 26 F.3d 105, 107 (1994)
cited Cited "see" Dixon v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See DuFresne v. Commissioner, 26 F.3d 105 (9th Cir. 1994) .
cited Cited "see" Henry F.K. Kersting Pacific Paradise, Inc. Atlas Funding Corporation v. United States of America,defendant-Appellee
9th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dufresne v. Commissioner, 26 F.3d 105, 107 (9th Cir.1994) (vacating the decisions in the test cases and ordering an evidentiary hearing on the effect of the undisclosed settlement agreements).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael AKINS; Betty Akins, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Ronald J. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellee, American Nuclear Insurers, Inc., Defendant-Appellant
90-16163.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jun 7, 1994.
26 F.3d 105
Goodwin, O'Scannlain, Rymer.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

On February 3, 1994, this court issued an opinion that affirmed the district court’s decision to abstain from hearing this case because of a pending state case. Akins v. Rodriguez, 15 F.3d 883 (9th Cir.1994). On February 25, 1994, we stayed the mandate pending a sua sponte call for en banc reconsideration to determine whether our opinion conflicts with Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 12 F.3d 908 (9th Cir.1993).

On May 12, 1994, the parties filed a stipulation for dismissal of the entire action with prejudice. Accordingly, this ease is DISMISSED pursuant to the stipulation of the parties.

This court’s opinion filed on February 3, 1994, is VACATED and the case is REMANDED with instructions to the district court to VACATE its judgment. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).