Humanitarian Law Proj. Ralph Fertig Ilankai Thamil Sangam Tamils of N. California Tamil Welfare & Human Rights Comm. Fed'n of Tamil Sangams of North Am. World Tamil Coordinating Comm. Nagalingam Jeyalingam v. United States Dep't of Just. United States Dep't of State John Ashcroft, Attorney Gen. Colin L. Powell, Sec'y of State, Humanitarian Law Proj. Ralph Fertig Ilankai Thamil Sangam Tamils of N. California Tamil Welfare & Human Rights Comm. Fed'n of Tamil Sangams of North Am. World Tamil Coordinating Comm. Nagalingam Jeyalingam v. United States Dep't of Just. Madeleine K. Albright Us Dept of State Janet Reno, Attorney Gen., as Attorney Gen. of the United States, 382 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Humanitarian Law Proj. Ralph Fertig Ilankai Thamil Sangam Tamils of N. California Tamil Welfare & Human Rights Comm. Fed'n of Tamil Sangams of North Am. World Tamil Coordinating Comm. Nagalingam Jeyalingam v. United States Dep't of Just. United States Dep't of State John Ashcroft, Attorney Gen. Colin L. Powell, Sec'y of State, Humanitarian Law Proj. Ralph Fertig Ilankai Thamil Sangam Tamils of N. California Tamil Welfare & Human Rights Comm. Fed'n of Tamil Sangams of North Am. World Tamil Coordinating Comm. Nagalingam Jeyalingam v. United States Dep't of Just. Madeleine K. Albright Us Dept of State Janet Reno, Attorney Gen., as Attorney Gen. of the United States, 382 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (scotus, 2010-06-21)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
SCOTUS · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See 382 F.3d 1154 , 1155 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (2×)
SCOTUS · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See 382 F. 3d 1154 , 1155 (2004).
cited Cited "see" Humanitarian Law Project v. Mukasey
9th Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Humanitarian Law Project v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 382 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir.2004).
cited Cited "see" Humanitarian Law v. Mukasey
9th Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Humanitarian Law Project v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 382 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2004).
cited Cited "see" Humanitarian Law Project v. Mukasey
9th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Humanitarian Law Project v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 382 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2004).
cited Cited "see" Humanitarian Law Project v. Mukasey
9th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Humanitarian Law Project v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 382 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir.2004).
cited Cited "see" Humanitarian Law Project v. Gonzales
C.D. Cal. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Humanitarian Law Project v. United States Department of State, 382 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir.2004).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Hammoud
4th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Humanitarian Law Project v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 382 F.3d 1154 , 2004 WL 2021563 (9th Cir. Sept. 8, 2004), 2004 U.S.App.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Hammoud
4th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Humanitarian Law Project v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 382 F.3d 1154 , 2004 WL 2021563 (9th Cir. Sept. 8, 2004), 2004 U.S.App.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Raj Kumar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Raj Kumar, Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Knezevic v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir.2004); see also INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478 , 481 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) ("[t]o reverse the BIA finding we must find that the evidence not only supports that conclusion, but compels it"). 19 We also review under the substantial evidence standard the BIA's decision that an applicant has not met the higher burden required for withholding of removal, Thomas v. Ashcroft, 359 F.3d 1169, 1174 (9th Cir.2004) reh'g en banc granted, 382 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir.2004), superceded sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Humanitarian Law Project Ralph Fertig Ilankai Thamil Sangam Tamils of Northern California Tamil Welfare and Human Rights Committee Federation of Tamil Sangams of North America World Tamil Coordinating Committee Nagalingam Jeyalingam
v.
United States Department of Justice United States Department of State John Ashcroft, Attorney General Colin L. Powell, Secretary of State, Humanitarian Law Project Ralph Fertig Ilankai Thamil Sangam Tamils of Northern California Tamil Welfare & Human Rights Committee Federation of Tamil Sangams of North America World Tamil Coordinating Committee Nagalingam Jeyalingam v. United States Department of Justice Madeleine K. Albright Us Dept of State Janet Reno, Attorney General, as Attorney General of the United States
02-55082.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Sep 8, 2004.
382 F.3d 1154
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

382 F.3d 1154

HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT; Ralph Fertig; Ilankai Thamil Sangam; Tamils of Northern California; Tamil Welfare and Human Rights Committee; Federation of Tamil Sangams of North America; World Tamil Coordinating Committee; Nagalingam Jeyalingam, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; United States Department of State; John Ashcroft, Attorney General; Colin L. Powell, Secretary of State, Defendants-Appellees.
Humanitarian Law Project; Ralph Fertig; Ilankai Thamil Sangam; Tamils of Northern California; Tamil Welfare & Human Rights Committee; Federation of Tamil Sangams of North America; World Tamil Coordinating Committee; Nagalingam Jeyalingam, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
United States Department of Justice; Madeleine K. Albright; US Dept of State; Janet Reno, Attorney General, as Attorney General of the United States, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 02-55082.

No. 02-55083.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

September 8, 2004.

Nancy Chang, Esq., Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran, Esq., New York, NY, Paul L. Hoffman, Esq., Schonbrun, Desimone, Seplow, Harris and Hoffman, LLP, Venice, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

David Cole, Esq., Washington, DC, Carol A. Sobel, Esq., Law Office of Carol A. Sobel, Santa Monica, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants and Defendant-Appellee.

Douglas N. Letter, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Colin L. Powell, Secretary of State, John R. Tyler, Esq., Yoel Tobin, Esq, for Defendants-Appellees.

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,[1] it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Notes:

1

Judge Fisher is recused