Hawthorne Sav. F.S.B. Hawthorne Fin. Corp. v. Reliance Ins. Co. of Illinois, Hawthorne Sav. F.S.B. Hawthorne Fin. Corp. v. M. Diane Koken, Ins. Comm'r of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in Her Capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Ins. Co., Intervenor-Appellant, Reliance Ins. Co. of Illinois, 433 F.3d 1089 (9th Cir. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Hawthorne Sav. F.S.B. Hawthorne Fin. Corp. v. Reliance Ins. Co. of Illinois, Hawthorne Sav. F.S.B. Hawthorne Fin. Corp. v. M. Diane Koken, Ins. Comm'r of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in Her Capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Ins. Co., Intervenor-Appellant, Reliance Ins. Co. of Illinois, 433 F.3d 1089 (9th Cir. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases · 2 courts · …he necessary question in cases such as this one is whether operation of the diversity jurisdiction statute actually 'invalidate, impair, or supersede' the state's liquidation efforts ⚠ not in text
21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: James Norvell v. Bnsf Railway Company (ca9, 2023-05-08)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) James Norvell v. Bnsf Railway Company
9th Cir. · 2023 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
e read jury instructions as a whole to determine whether they are accurate.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Mabry v. Conocophillips Alaska
D. Alaska · 2021 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
under erie railroad co. v. tompkins, federal courts sitting in diversity jurisdiction apply state substantive law and federal procedural law.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Catalina Holdings (Bermuda) Ltd. v. Hammer
E.D. Ill. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he necessary question in cases such as this one is whether operation of the diversity jurisdiction statute actually 'invalidate, impair, or supersede' the state's liquidation efforts
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Catalina Holdings (Bermuda) Limited v. Jennifer Hammer, Director of Insurance of the State of Illinois, as Liquidator of Legion Indemnity Company
N.D. Ill. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he necessary question in cases such as this one is whether operation of the diversity jurisdiction statute actually 'invalidate, impair, or supersede' the state's liquidation efforts
cited Cited "see" Department of Transportation v. American Motorists Insurance
Mich. Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hawthorne Savings FSB v Reliance Ins Co of III, 421 F3d 835 , 852 (CA 9, 2005), amended in part on other grounds 433 F3d 1089 (CA 9, 2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. Hawthorne Financial Corporation
v.
Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois, Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. Hawthorne Financial Corporation v. M. Diane Koken, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in Her Capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant, Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois
03-55548.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jan 13, 2006.
433 F.3d 1089
Cited by 16 opinions  |  Published
3 passages pin-cited by 4 cases
Pinpoint authority: #19,945 of 633,719
Citer courts: D. Alaska (1) · Ninth Circuit (1) · E.D. Illinois (1) · N.D. Illinois (1)

433 F.3d 1089

HAWTHORNE SAVINGS F.S.B.; Hawthorne Financial Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Defendant-Appellant.
Hawthorne Savings F.S.B.; Hawthorne Financial Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
M. Diane Koken, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in her capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant,
Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois, Defendant.

No. 03-55548.

No. 03-55611.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted December 6, 2004.

Filed August 24, 2005.

Amended January 13, 2006.

W. Wendell Hall and Rosemarie Kanusky, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., San Antonio, TX, Claudia Morehead and Robert S. Schulman, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., Los Angeles, CA, and Oscar Rey Rodriguez, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for the defendant-appellant.

Pamela H. Woldow, Chief Counsel, Insurance Department, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg, PA, for the intervenor-appellant.

Jeffrey A. Tidus and David P. Crochetiere, Baute & Tidus LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Dickran M. Tevrizian, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. Nos. CV-99-13119-DT(AJW), CV-99-13119-DT.

Before BROWNING, PREGERSON, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The Opinion filed on August 24, 2005 and appearing at 421 F.3d 835 (9th Cir.2005) is hereby amended as follows:

2

1) 421 F.3d at 852, Slip Op. p. 11371, third to last line: after "state court do" add "under the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act (UILA), CAL. INS. CODE §§ 1064.1-.12"

3

2) 421 F.3d at 852, Slip Op. p. 11372, lines 5-6: replace "Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act (UILA), CAL. INS. CODE §§ 1064.1-.12" with "UILA"

4

3) 421 F.3d at 856, Slip Op. p. 11378, line 16: after "stay its proceedings" add "under the UILA"