Mark v. Davis, 50 F.3d 12 (8th Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Mark v. Davis, 50 F.3d 12 (8th Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Conner v. Commissioner of Social Security (wawd, 2024-04-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Conner v. Commissioner of Social Security
W.D. Wash. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
However, an ALJ “may not disregard [a claimant’s testimony] 10 solely because it is not substantiated affirmatively by objective medical evidence.” Robbins v. 11 Social Security Administration, 466 F.3d 880, 883 (9th Cir. 2006); see Orteza v. Shalala, 50 F.3d 12 748, 749–50 (9th Cir. 1995); Byrnes v. Shalala, 60 F.3d 639, 641-42 (9th Cir. 1995).
discussed Cited "see" Calloway v. Commissioner (2×)
unknown court · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gehl v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 784, 789-90 (1994), affd. without published opinion 50 F.3d 12 (8th Cir. 1995); sec. 1.1001-2(a), Income Tax Regs.; Rev.
discussed Cited "see" Commissioner
unknown court · Wil · signal: see · confidence high
See Gehl v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 784 , 786 (1994) , affd. without published opinion 50 F.3d 12 (8th Cir. 1995) ; Bialock v. Commissioner, 35 T.C. 649 , 660 (1961) ; sec. 1.1001-2(c), Example (8), Income Tax Regs.
discussed Cited "see" CORDUAN (2×)
unknown court · Dan · signal: see · confidence high
See Gehl v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 784 (1994) , affd. without published opinion 50 F.3d 12 (8th Cir. 1995) .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Burke v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
Sec. 1001; see also Gehl v. Commissioner , 102 T.C. 784 , 785 (1994) , affd. without published opinion 50 F.3d 12 (8th Cir. 1995) ; Danenberg v. Commissioner , 73 T.C. 370 , 380-381 (1979) ; Estate of Delman v. Commissioner , 73 T.C. 15 , 28 (1979) ; Bialock v. Commissioner , 35 T.C. 649 , 660 (1961) .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kim M. Mark
v.
C/o Davis C/o Delgado Robert Umthum Unknown/unnamed Sued as John Doe Nos. 1-N Terry Mapes Unknown/ Unnamed Sued as Sanders John Henry John Emmett
94-3173.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Mar 23, 1995.
50 F.3d 12
Unpublished

50 F.3d 12

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
Kim M. MARK, Appellant,
v.
C/O DAVIS; C/O Delgado; Robert Umthum; Unknown/Unnamed
Defendants, sued as John Doe
Nos. 1-N; Terry Mapes; Unknown/ Unnamed Defendants, Sued
as Sanders; John Henry; John Emmett, Appellees.

No. 94-3173SI.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Mar. 15, 1995.
Filed: Mar. 23, 1995.

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Kim M. Mark, an Iowa inmate, appeals the district court's dismissal with prejudice after a bench trial of Mark's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Having brought a civil rights case against the prison officials who removed a rosary from his cell, Mark must show a sincerely held religious belief in the confiscated religious property to establish a violation of his constitutional right to free exercise of religion. Following trial, the district court found that Mark failed to prove "the rosary removed from [his cell] had religious significance and was important to him in his practice of a sincerely held religious belief." Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we are satisfied that no error of law appears and the district court's findings are not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.