Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 556 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 556 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lewis v. First American Title Insurance (idd, 2010-02-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Lewis v. First American Title Insurance
D. Idaho · 2010 · confidence medium
Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 556 F.3d 919, 919 (9th Cir.2009). .
cited Cited "see" Lyall v. City of Denver
D. Colo. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See 556 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2009).
cited Cited "see" In re Countrywide Financial Corp. Securities Litigation
C.D. Cal. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 556 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2009) (order taking case en banc).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jackson v. Unocal Corp.
Colo. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Williams v. Mohawk Indus., Inc., 568 F.3d 1350, 1359 (11th Cir.2009) (concluding trial court abused its discretion by not certifying class because, in part, it "accepted the employees' expert testimony without examining it or explaining its affect [sic] on the predominance analysis."); In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation, 552 F.3d at 323-24 ("Weighing conflicting expert testimony at the certification stage ... may be integral to the rigorous analysis Rule 23 demands."); In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation, 522 F.3d 6, 25 (1st Cir.2008) ("[A] searching inq…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Betty DUKES; Patricia Surgeson; Cleo Page; Deborah Gunter; Karen Williamson; Christine Kwapnoski; Edith Arana, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
WAL-MART, INC., Defendant-Appellant. Betty Dukes; Patricia Surgeson; Cleo Page; Deborah Gunter; Karen Williamson; Christine Kwapnoski; Edith Arana, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Wal-Mart, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
04-16688, 04-16720.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Feb 13, 2009.
556 F.3d 919
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Debra Gardner, Esquire, Jonathan Smith, Esquire, Baltimore, MD, Irma Dolores Herrera, Esquire, Equal Rights Advocates, City Name, CA, Jocelyn Dion Larkin, Brad Seligman, The Impact Fund, Berkeley, CA, Shauna I. Marshall, Esquire, Hastings College of the Law, Debra Smith, Equal Rights Advocates, Steven L. Stemerman, Esquire, Elizabeth Ann Lawrence, Esquire, Davis Cowell & Bowe, San Francisco, CA, Joseph Sellers, Christine E. Webber, Partner, Deborah J. Vagins, Esquire, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC, Washington, DC, Stephen Tinkler, Esquire, Tinker & Bennett, Merit Bennett, Esquire, Charles V. Firth, Esquire, Tinker & Firth, Santa Fe, NM, Sheila Thomas, Esquire, Equal Rights Advocates, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Nancy L. Abell, Esquire, Paul Grossman, Esquire, Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker LLP, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Esquire, Gail E. Lees, Esquire, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Katherine Consuelo Huibonhoa, Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker, LLP, Mark Andrew Perry, Counsel, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Barbara A. Johnson, Esquire, Neal D. Mollen, Esquire, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.

Jeffrey A. Berman, Esquire, Sidley Austin LLP, Joel E. Krischer, Esquire, Latham & Watkins, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Ann Elizabeth Reesman, Esquire, Rae T. Vann, General Counsel, Norris, Tysse, Lampley & Lakis, LLP, Evelyn L. Becker, Esquire, John H. Beisner, Esquire, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Richard Abbott Samp, Chief Counsel, Washington Legal Foundation, Raymond C. Fay, Esquire, Constantine Cannon LLP, Sandi Farrell, Esquire, Mehri & Skalet, PLLC, Daniel B. Kohrman, Esquire, American Association of Retired Persons, Michael Foreman, Esquire, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights, Washington, DC, Terri L. Ross, Esquire, McDermott Will & Emery, New York, NY, Marissa M. Tirona, Esquire, National Employment Lawyers Assoc., Maureen K. Bogue, Esquire, Law Offices, San Francisco, CA, Bill Lann Lee, Esquire, Lewis Feinberg Lee Renaker & Jackson, PC, Oakland, CA, David R. Bruce, Esquire, Law Offices, Santa Rosa, CA, Richard L. Berkman, Esquire, Dechert Price & Rhoads, Philadelphia, PA, for Amicus Curiae.

Mark E. Barton, Esquire, Hersh & Hersh LLP, San Francisco, CA, Joe R. Whatley, Esquire, Whatley Drake & Kallas LLC, New York, NY, for Amicus.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

[*920] Judges McKEOWN, RAWLINSON and BYBEE did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.