Cintas Corp. v. Abel, 658 F.3d 888 (9th Cir. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Cintas Corp. v. Abel, 658 F.3d 888 (9th Cir. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Glover v. United States (mdd, 2014-01-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Glover v. United States
D. Maryland · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Aziz v. Alcolac, 658 F.3d 888 , 390 (4th Cir.2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CINTAS CORPORATION, Plan Administrator for the Cintas Partners' Plan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert J. ABEL; David J. Abrahamsen; Nicholas Ackerman; Randall Adams; Jack Addison; Donald Adkins; Joseph W. Adolph; Bradley Agler; Jason Agostini; Vince Agozzino, Defendants-Appellants.
07-16318.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Aug 25, 2011.
658 F.3d 888
D.W. Nelson, Reinhardt, and Bea, Circuit Judges.
Published

Mark Coleman Dosker, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P., San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

[*889] Lawrence Allen Abelson, Esquire, Epport, Richman & Robbins, LLP, Albert H. Meyerhoff, Jr., Esquire, Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins, LLP Los Angeles, CA, Nancy Juda, Esquire, Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins, LLP, Washington, DC, Michael Rubin, Altshuler Berzon LLP, San Francisco, CA, Theresa Mary Traber, Esquire, Traber & Voorhees, Pasadena, CA, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before: D.W. NELSON, REINHARDT, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The parties' joint request that the above-captioned appellate proceedings be dismissed as moot is GRANTED.

This case is hereby DISMISSED. All parties shall bear their own attorneys fees and costs on appeal.

A certified copy of this order sent to the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court.