Concept Design Elec. & Mfg., Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Duplitronics, Inc., 68 F.3d 487 (Fed. Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Concept Design Elec. & Mfg., Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Duplitronics, Inc., 68 F.3d 487 (Fed. Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Roche Diagnostics Corp. v. Selfcare Inc. (insd, 2002-11-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Roche Diagnostics Corp. v. Selfcare Inc.
S.D. Ind. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ciba-Geigy, 68 F.3d 487 , 1995 WL 598380, at *2; Studiengesellschaft Kohle, m.b.H. v. Dart Indus., Inc., 726 F.2d 724, 726-27 (Fed.Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see" Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. (2×)
D.N.J. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. Alza Corp., 864 F.Supp. 429, 436 (D.N.J.1994), aff'd in part, vacated in part, 68 F.3d 487 (Fed.
discussed Cited "see" Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ad Hoc Comm. of AZ-NM-TX-FL Producers of Gray Portland Cement v. United States, 18 CIT 906 , 915, 865 F.Supp. 857 , 865 n. 21 (1994), aff'd, 68 F.3d 487 (Fed.Cir.1995); National Steel Corp. v. United States, 18 CIT 1126 , 1131, 870 F.Supp. 1130, 1135 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" Peer Bearing Co. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ad Hoc Comm, of AZ-NM-TX-FL Producers of Gray Portland Cement v. United States, 18 CIT 906 , 915 n. 21, 865 F.Supp. 857 , 865 n. 21 (1994), aff'd, 68 F.3d 487 , 1995 WL 596834 (Fed.Cir.1995); National Steel Corp. v. United States, 18 CIT 1126 , 1131, 870 F.Supp. 1130, 1135 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" AK Steel Corp. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ad Hoc Comm, of AZ-NM-TX-FL Producers of Gray Portland Cement v. United States, 18 CIT 906 ,915, 865 F. Supp. 857, 865 (1994) (finding that Commerce’ s application of adverse BIA was appropriate because, “ [t]he purpose of the BIA provision is to induce respondents to provide Commerce with timely, complete and accurate information * **.”), aff’d 68 F.3d 487 (Fed.
cited Cited "see" Torrington Co. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ad Hoc Comm. of AZ-NM-TX-FL Producers of Gray Portland Cement v. United States, 18 CIT _ , 865 F. Supp. 857 (1994) (purchase price transactions only), aff’d per curiam, 68 F.3d 487 (Fed.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Concept Design Electronics and Manufacturing, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant
v.
Duplitronics, Inc.
95-1081.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Oct 10, 1995.
68 F.3d 487
Unpublished

68 F.3d 487

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
CONCEPT DESIGN ELECTRONICS AND MANUFACTURING, INC.,
Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant,
v.
DUPLITRONICS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 95-1081, 95-1090.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 10, 1995.

Before MAYER, MICHEL, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

1

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.