green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Adams v. Lakeview Medical Center, LLC
“Terminating an employee whose performance is unsatisfactory according to management's business judgment is legitimate and nondiscriminatory as a matter of law.” EEOC v. LHC Grp., Inc., 773 F.3d 688 , 701–02 (5th Cir. 2014) (citing Walton v. Bisco Indus., Inc., 119 F.3d 368 , 372–73 (5th Cir. 1997) (per curiam); Smith v. Rockwell Int'l Corp., 77 F.3d 473, 473 (5th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (unpublished)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. LHC Group, Inc.
See Walton v. Bisco Indus., Inc., 119 F.3d 368, 372-73 (5th Cir.1997) (per curiam); Smith v. Rockwell Int’l Corp., 77 F.3d 473, 473 (5th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (unpublished) (“Rockwell offered a legitimate reason for placing Smith on medical layoff: Smith’s physicians had imposed permanent medical restrictions on his activities that precluded him from performing the material duties of his position.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carl Washington v. City of Gulfport Mississippi
See Hennessey v. Blalack, 77 F.3d 473 (5th Cir.1995) (noting that this court has discretion to strike references to matters which are outside the record); United States v. Martin, 131 F.3d 141 (5th Cir.1997) (a case where this court ignored references to matters outside the record and ruled on the record properly before it). * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carter v. The United States of America Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:19-cr-380-2.
See, e.g., United States v. Bazan, 77 F.3d 473 (Sth Cir. 1995) (unpublished) (“[A]n attorney's incorrect prediction of the application of Sentencing Guidelines does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.”) The Court construes all pro se filings liberally.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Heinzle
Id.; see also In re Reid, 179 B.R. 504, 507-08 (E.D.Tex.1995) (decision as to whether the debtor may act a disbursing agent left to sound discretion of the bankruptcy judge), aff'd, 77 F.3d 473 (5th Cir.1995); Cohen v. Lopez (In re Lopez), 550 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir.2008) (Code does not require that payments to a mortgagee be made through the trustee).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Sanford
(2×)
See, e.g., First Bank & Trust v. Gross (In re Reid), 179 B.R. 504 (E.D.Tex.) [rejecting an agreement for direct payment between the debtor and the affected creditor and finding that avoidance of the payment of the Trustee's commission is a singularly insufficient reason to permit a debtor to act as disbursing agent], aff'd without op., case no. 95-40249, 77 F.3d 473 (5th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (Table decision at 77 F.3d 473 ); In re Ford, 179 B.R. 821, 823 (Bankr.E.D.Tex.1995) [holding that modifications of allowed secured claims should generally be performed and paid through the auspices of t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In The Matter Of Josephine M. Mendoza
See, e.g., In re Reid, 179 B.R. 504, 507 (E.D.Tex.1995), aff'd, 77 F.3d 473 (5th Cir.1995) (stating that the general rule requires that debts provided for in a Chapter 13 plan be paid through the trustee). 12 Temple contends that pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 1322(b)(2), a Chapter 13 plan may modify "the rights of holders of secured claims, other than a claim secured only by a security interest in real property that is the debtor's residence...." Temple relies on the "other than" language of § 1322(b)(2) and the United States Supreme Court's decision in Nobelman v. American Savings Bank…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendoza v. Temple-Inland Mortgage Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., In re Reid, 179 B.R. 504, 507 (E.D.Tex.1995), aff'd, 77 F.3d 473 (5th Cir.1995) (stating that the general rule requires that debts provided for in a Chapter 13 plan be paid through the trustee).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Centriz of N America
v.
Mendez-Penate, et a
v.
Mendez-Penate, et a
95-20133.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Dec 8, 1995.
77 F.3d 473
Unpublished
In Matter of Centriz of North
NOS. 95-20133, 95-20135
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Dec 12, 1995
1
Appeal From: S.D.Tex., No. CA-H-93-3430, CA-H-93-3652
2
REVERSED.