Ex Parte Quirin, 47 F. Supp. 431 (D.D.C. 1942). · Go Syfert
Search
Ex Parte Quirin, 47 F. Supp. 431 (D.D.C. 1942). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dorsey v. Gill (cadc, 1945-02-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Dorsey v. Gill
D.C. Cir. · 1945 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, Ex parte Quirin, D.C., 47 F.Supp. 431 , 317 U.S. 1 , 63 S.Ct. 1 , 2, 87 L.Ed. 3 ; and the many cases titled “Ex parte” in the reports of the Supreme Court.
discussed Cited "see" Dorsey v. Gill
D.C. Cir. · 1945 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, Ex parte Quirin, D.C., 47 F.Supp. 431 , 317 U.S. 1 , 63 S.Ct. 1 , 2, 87 L.Ed. 3 ; and the many cases titled "Ex parte" in the reports of the Supreme Court. [78] Pope v. Huff, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 18, 19 , 141 F.2d 727, 728 ; Rookard v. Huff, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 291 , 145 F.2d 708 . [79] Polish-American Building & Loan Ass'n, Inc. v. Dembowczyk, 167 Md. 259 , 173 A. 254 ; Cuff v. United States, 9 Cir., 64 F.2d 624, 627 ; Keown v. Hughes, 1 Cir., 265 F. 572, 575 ; see Hewitt v. Great Western Beet Sugar Co., 9 Cir., 230 F.2d 394 , 398; see 101 A.L.R. 1325 ; 120 A.L.R. 85 , 132. [80] Ridd…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ex Parte QUIRIN (And Six Other Cases)
District Court, District of Columbia.
Jul 28, 1942.
47 F. Supp. 431
Colonel Kenneth C. Royall, of Raleigh, N. C., for petitioners., Francis B. Biddle, Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Morris.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
MORRIS, District Judge.

The petitioner, Richard Quirin, asks leave to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by his counsel.. It is conceded by petitioner’s counsel that petitioner landed on the coast of the United States in June, 1942, from a German submarine, with explosives, which he was instructed by a German officer to use for the purpose of committing sabotage on certain American industries. In view of this statement of fact, it seems clear that the petitioner comes within that category of subjects, citizens or residents of a nation at war with the United States, who, by a proclamation of the President, dated July 2, 1942, are not privileged to seek any remedy or maintain any proceeding in the courts of the United States.

I do not consider that Ex parte Milligan, 4 Wall. 2, 18 L.Ed. 281, is controlling in the circumstances of this petitioner. The application of the petitioner must, therefore, be denied.