R & D Dynamics Corp. v. United States, 309 Fed. Appx. 388 (Fed. Cir. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
R & D Dynamics Corp. v. United States, 309 Fed. Appx. 388 (Fed. Cir. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sperient Corp. v. United States (uscfc, 2013-09-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Sperient Corp. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See R & D Dynamics Corp. v. United States, 309 Fed.Appx. 388 (2009); see also U.S.Ct.App.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
R & D DYNAMICS CORPORATION
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 2008-5005.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Jan 28, 2009.
309 Fed. Appx. 388
William T. Welch, Barton, Baker, McMahon & Tolle, LLP of McLean, VA, argued for plaintiff-appellant., Delisa M. Sanchez, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief was Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Donald E. Kinner, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was Daniel Pantzer, Associate Counsel, Protest/Litigation Branch, Office of Command Counsel Headquarters, United States Army Material Command, of Fort Belvoir, VA.
Moore, Newman, Schall.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.