Carlton v. Carlton, 83 So. 87 (Fla. 1919). · Go Syfert
Search
Carlton v. Carlton, 83 So. 87 (Fla. 1919). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
79 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lillian H. Bosch v. United States (ca5, 1979-02-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1920 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1920 1973 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Lillian H. Bosch v. United States (2×)
5th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carlton v. Carlton, 78 Fla. 252 , 83 So. 87 ; Taylor v. Taylor, 100 Fla. 1009 , 130 So. 713 . *168 The provisions of section 4987, Comp.
discussed Cited "see" Burns v. Burns (2×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carlton v. Carlton, 78 Fla. 252 , 83 So. 87 ; Lowrie v. Lowrie, 92 Fla. 337 , 111 So. 288 ; Taylor v. Taylor [ 100 Fla. 1009 ], 130 So. 713 .” We are of the view that here the chancellor in adjudicating the property rights of the Burnses could have found a special equitable interest in the property in favor of the husband.
discussed Cited "see" Chaachou v. Chaachou (2×)
Fla. · 1961 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carlton v. Carlton, 78 Fla. 252 , 83 So. 87 ; Taylor v. Taylor, 100 Fla. 1009 , 130 So. 713 ; Heath v. Heath, 103 Fla. 1071 , 138 So. 796 , 82 A.L.R. 537 ; Windham v. Windham, 144 Fla. 563 , 198 So. 202 ; Strauss v. Strauss, [148] Fla. [23], 3 So.2d 727 .' "In Giachetti v. Giachetti, supra, the Supreme Court of Florida said (25 So.2d at pp. 658, 659): "`The chancellor personally heard the testimony and found the equities with the wife.
discussed Cited "see" Chaachou v. Chaachou (2×)
Fla. Cir. Ct., Miami-Dade Cty. · 1960 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carlton v. Carlton, 78 Fla. 252 , 83 So. 87 ; Taylor v. Taylor, 100 Fla. 1009 , 130 So. 713 ; Heath v. Heath, 103 Fla. 1071 , 138 So. 796 , 82 A.L.R. 537 ; Windham v. Windham, 144 Fla. 563 , 198 So. 202 ; Strauss v. Strauss, Fla., 3 So.2d 727 .
discussed Cited "see" Engebretsen v. Engebretsen (2×)
Fla. · 1942 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carlton v. Carlton, 78 Fla. 252 , 83 So. 87 ; Taylor v. Taylor, 100 Fla. 1009 , 130 So. 713 ; Heath v. Heath, 103 Fla. 1071 , 138 So. 796 ; Windham v. Windham, *391 144 Fla. 563 , 198 So. 202 ; Strauss v. Strauss, 148 Fla. 23 , 3 So. (2nd) 727 .
discussed Cited "see" Masilotti v. Masilotti
Fla. · 1942 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carlton v. Carlton, 78 Fla. 252 , 83 So. *94 87; Taylor v. Taylor, 100 Fla. 1009 , 130 So. 713 ; Heath v. Heath, 103 Fla. 1071 , 138 So. 796 ; Windham v. Windham, 144 Fla. 563 , 198 So. 202 ; Strauss v. Strauss, 148 Fla. 23 , 3 So. (2nd) 737 .
discussed Cited "see" Windham v. Windham (2×)
Fla. · 1940 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carlton v. Carlton, 78 Fla. 252 , 83 So. 87 .
discussed Cited "see" Sonneman v. Tuszynski, Et Ux. (2×)
Fla. · 1939 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carlton v. Carlton, 78 Fla. 252 , 83 So.
discussed Cited "see" Francis v. Francis (2×)
Fla. · 1938 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carlton v. Carlton, 78 Fla. 252 , 83 Sou. 87 ; Taylor v. Taylor, 100 Fla. 1009 , 130 Sou. 713 ; Heath v. Heath, 103 Fla. 1071 ; 138 Sou. 796 ; Ammer v. Ammer, 113 Fla. 368 , 151 Sou. 711 ; Hill v. Hill, 123 Fla. 571 , 167 Sou. 414 .
discussed Cited "see" Heath v. Heath (2×)
Fla. · 1932 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carlton v. Carlton, 78 Fla. 252 , 83 Sou.
discussed Cited "see" Meloche v. Meloche (2×)
Fla. · 1931 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carlton v. Carlton, 78 Fla. 252 , 83 So. 87 ; Lowrie v. Lowrie, 92 Fla. 337 , 111 So. 288 ; Taylor v. Taylor, 130 So. 713 , ....
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ada Carlton
v.
Thomas N. Carlton
Supreme Court of Florida.
Aug 1, 1919.
83 So. 87
Altman & Morrow, for Appellant;, W. W. Whitehurst and Doyle E. Carlton, for Appellee.
Cited by 36 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

— A divorce was granted to the husband upon the statutory grounds of habitual indulgence in violent and ungovernable temper and extreme cruelty, and the chancellor denied the wife’s application for alimony, and she appealed. There is sufficient testimony to support the decree of divorce; but we think the circumstances of this case require some provision to be made for the wife, out of the husband’s property.

The appellant is the mother of the appellee's six children ; she generously contributed in funds and by her personal exertion and industry through a long period of time to the acquisition and development of his home and other property and the establishment of his fortune. This gives her a special equity in the property which she aided in acquiring and preserving.

The portion of the decree granting a divorce is affirmed, but that portion which denied her any maintenance is reversed, and the cause is remanded for appropriate pro[*254] ceeding in awarding ber a reasonable allowance for her maintenance and support.

It is so ordered.

All concur.