Perry v. State, 58 S.E. 60 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907). · Go Syfert
Search
Perry v. State, 58 S.E. 60 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Territory of Hawaii v. Van Culin (haw, 1942-06-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1907 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1907 1966 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Territory of Hawaii v. Van Culin
Haw. · 1942 · confidence medium
Every practitioner knows how eagerly alert jurors are to every utterance from the bench, and how sensitive is the mind of the juror to the slightest judicial expression.” Sharpton v. State, 1 Ga. App. 542, 548, 549 ; 57 S. E. 929, 932 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Fair v. State
Ga. · 1929 · confidence medium
As said by Chief Judge Hill, in Sharpton v. State, 1 Ga. App. 542, 548, 549 ( 57 S. E. 929 ), “Every practitioner knows how eagerly alert jurors are to every utterance from the bench, and how sensitive is the mind of the juror to the slightest judicial expression.” See also opinion of Luke, J., in Spivey v. State, 38 Ga. App. 213 ( 143 S. E. 450 ), and cit.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Spivey v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1928 · confidence medium
In this connection, we quote from Sharpton v. State, 1 Ga. App. 542, 548 ( 58 S. E. 60 ), as follows: “It is almost an intellectual impossibility for a judge to engage in an examination of a witness on vital questions of the case on trial, without in some manner and to some extent indicating his own opinion.
cited Cited "see" Mize v. Cloud
Ga. Ct. App. · 1915 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sharpton v. State, 1 Ga. App. 542 ( 57 S. E. 929 ).
cited Cited "see" Brown v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1909 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sharpton v. State, 1 Ga. App. 542 (57 S. E. 929 ).
discussed Cited "see" Ray v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1908 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sharpton v. State, 1 Ga. App. 542 ( 57 S. E. 929 ); Taylor v. State, 2 Ga. App. 723 ( 59 S. E. 12 ); Dicks v. State, 2 Ga. App. 192 ( 58 S. E. 335 ); Ford v. State, 2 Ga. App. 834 ( 59 S. E. 88 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Roberts v. Stennett (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Perry v. State, 1 Ga. App. 542 (1) ( 58 SE 60 ) (1907).” Long v. Marion, 182 Ga. App. 361, 364 (3) ( 355 SE2d 711 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Long v. Marion (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Perry v. State, 1 Ga. App. 542 (1) ( 58 SE 60 ) (1907).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Northwest Atlanta Bank v. Manning
Ga. · 1941 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Mulherin v. Porter, 1 Ga. App. 153 ( 58 S. E. 60 ); Hanesley v. National Park Bank, 147 Ga. 96 ( 92 S. E. 879 ); 38 C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Perry
v.
State
366.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Mar 28, 1907.
58 S.E. 60
T. R. Perry, C. O. Hall, for plaintiff in error., W. T. Thomas, solicitor-general, by W. E. Talley, contra.
Hill.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Hill, C. J.

1. On the trial of a defendant for violating the act of August 7, 1903 (Acts 1903, p. 91), by specific acts set forth in the indictment, the judge did not err in giving the whole of said act in his charge to the jury, although the general words with which the act concludes, and which were intended to embrace all other violations of it, did not apply to the case on trial. Especially is this true when it was not contended that the defendant was guilty except in the manner charged in the indictment.

2. No error of law was committed, and' the verdict was fully warranted by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed. Powell, J., disqualified.