Pierce v. Felts, 99 S.E. 139 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919). · Go Syfert
Search
Pierce v. Felts, 99 S.E. 139 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pierce
v.
Felts
10161.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Apr 22, 1919.
99 S.E. 139
H. W. Arant, for plaintiff in error., M. L. Felts, E. T. Shurley, E. P. Davis, contra.
Broyles.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
Broyles, P. J.

There being in the bill of exceptions no exception to any final judgment, but only an exception to the judgment striking the defendant’s pleas, the bill of exceptions must be dismissed. This is true even though the record shows that the ease was finally terminated by a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. McCranie v. Shipp, 10 Ga. App. 544 (73 S. E. 701).

Writ of error dismissed.

Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.