Walker v. State, 131 S.E. 187 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926). · Go Syfert
Search
Walker v. State, 131 S.E. 187 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Morrow v. State (gactapp, 1926-12-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Morrow v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1926 · signal: see · confidence high
See 34 Ga. App. 780 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Walker
v.
State
16949.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jan 12, 1926.
131 S.E. 187
F. W. Flynt, Charles J. Graham, for plaintiff in error., John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, Ralph H. Pharr, contra.
Broyles.
Published
Broyles, O. J.

1. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial show no cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

2. While the evidence tending to connect the accused with the offense charged was circumstantial, this court can not say, as a matter of law, that the jury were not authorized to find that the evidence was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused; and, the verdict of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.