Sumner v. Sumner, 43 S.E. 57 (Ga. 1902). · Go Syfert
Search
Sumner v. Sumner, 43 S.E. 57 (Ga. 1902). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Winn v. State (ga, 1906-02-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1903 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1903 1964 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Winn v. State
Ga. · 1906 · signal: see · confidence high
See (1) Sumner v. Sumner, 116 Ga. 798 ; (2) Swift v. Thomas, 101 Ga. 89 ; (3) Crow v. State, 111 Ga. 645 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sumner
v.
Sumner
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Dec 12, 1902.
43 S.E. 57
J. W. Walters and J. J. Forehand, for plaintiff in error., Sam. S. Bennet and Claude Payton, by Z. D. Harrison, contra.
Fish.
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published
Fish, J.

A paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions, but not signed by the plaintiff in error or bis counsel when certified by the trial judge, is not a legal bill of exceptions, and can not, over objection, be amended in the Supreme Court by attaching counsel’s name thereto. Upon motion, it will be dismissed. Civil Code, § 5527 ; Speer v. Merryman, 56 Ga. 529; Wellborn v. Railroad Co., 92 Ga. 577; Cook v. Banks, 95 Ga. 229.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.