Cooper v. Cooper, 79 S.E. 35 (Ga. 1913). · Go Syfert
Cooper v. Cooper, 79 S.E. 35 (Ga. 1913). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wall v. Humphries (ga, 1934-07-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Wall v. Humphries
Ga. · 1934 · confidence medium
In Remshart v. Savannah & Charleston Railroad Co., 54 Ga. 579 , it was held: “Where a bill praying for injunction is clearly without equity, the chancellor may decline to order the defendant to show canse against the application for a temporary injunction, and may refuse not only a restraining order but the injunction itself, upon mere inspection of the bill.” See, to the same effect, Connolly v. Morrison, 140 Ga. 492, 494 ( 79 S. E. 119 ).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Callaway v. Jackson
Ga. · 1934 · confidence medium
The present case differs on its facts from Remshart v. Savannah & Charleston Railroad Co., 54 Ga. 579 , Brown v. Wilson, 56 Ga. 534 , and Connally v. Morrison, 140 Ga. 492, 494 ( 79 S. E. 119 ), in which the judge refused an injunction, as distinguished from a mere restraining order.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Selders v. Brown
Ga. · 1930 · confidence medium
Connally v. Morrison, 140 Ga. 492, 494 ( 79 S. E. 119 ), and cit.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cooper
v.
Cooper
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Aug 13, 1913.
79 S.E. 35
Johnson & Johnson, for plaintiff in error., J. G. Collins, contra.
Fish.
Published
Fish, C. J.

There being no complaint that any error of law was committed upon the trial, and the evidence being sufficient to authorize the verdict, the court did not err in 'refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.