green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Waring v. John J. Thompson & Co.
See Howard v. Sills, 154 Ga. 430 ( 114 S. E. 580 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allison & Co. v. McMath Plantation Co.
See Howard v. Sills, 154 Ga. 430 ( 114 S. E. 580 ), in which the Supreme Court held: “ Where property is listed as indicated in the preceding note, and the broker procures a purchaser who is ready, willing, and able, and who through the broker actually offers, to buy at the price named, but only on terms other than all cash, such as might be agreed upon with the owner, and the owner refuses to meet the purchaser, assigning as the sole reason therefor that he wishes to withdraw the property from sale, the commissions of the broker are not earned.” 3.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Baker v. Wyatt
See also Long v. Collier, 154 Ga. 673 ( 115 S. E. 9 ); Williams v. Mize, 72 Ga. 129 ; Russell v. Tatum, 104 Ga. 332 ( 30 S. E. 812 ); Howard v. Tucker, 12 Ga. App. 353 ( 77 S. E. 191 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nix, sheriff
v.
Guthrie
v.
Guthrie
No. 3021.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Dec 16, 1922.
J. G. Smith and B. A. Hendr-iclcs, for plaintiffs in error., John P. & Dewey Knight, B. D. Smith, and H. J. Quincey, contra.
Fish.
Published
Fish, C. J.
This ease on its facts is controlled by the decision rendered in Guthrie v. Clyatt, ante, 427 (114 S. E. 808).
Judgment reversed.
All the Justices concur.