North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc., 214 S.E.2d 667 (Ga. 1975). · Go Syfert
Search
North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc., 214 S.E.2d 667 (Ga. 1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dropkin v. Dropkin (ga, 1976-10-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Dropkin v. Dropkin
Ga. · 1976 · confidence medium
The remedy is by a new petition based upon sufficient legal grounds and instituting a new case for a redetermination of the rights of custody; not by petition to modify or amend the original decree.” As stated in Jones v. Jones, 233 Ga. 793, 794 ( 213 SE2d 659 ) (1975): "A complaint to change custody awarded by a prior final judgment must be brought as a new action.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NORTH GEORGIA FINISHING, INC.
v.
DI-CHEM, INC.
28217.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Feb 25, 1975.
214 S.E.2d 667
Mitchell, Mitchell, Coppedge & Boyett, Samuel J. Brantley, for appellant., H. E. Kinney, L. Hugh Kemp, for appellees.
Undercofler.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

This case has been remanded to this court by the Supreme Court of the United States. That court has held that Georgia’s garnishment statute is unconstitutional. Therefore, the judgment in this case is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.