Queen Tufting Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 239 S.E.2d 27 (Ga. 1977). · Go Syfert
Queen Tufting Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 239 S.E.2d 27 (Ga. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: FIRST SOLAR ELECTRIC LLC v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY (gamd, 2024-12-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) FIRST SOLAR ELECTRIC LLC v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
M.D. Ga. · 2024 · confidence medium
Co., 239 Ga. 843, 843 , 239 S.E.2d 27, 28 (1977) (holding that the six-year statute of limitations applied over a twelve-month suit limitation clause because the clause contained the phrase “unless a longer period of time is provided by applicable statute”). brought within twelve months.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) RELF v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
M.D. Ga. · 2019 · confidence medium
In Queen Tufting Co., the contract stated, “No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any Court of law or equity unless . . . commenced within twelve (12) months next after the happening of the loss, unless a longer period of time is provided by applicable statute.” Queen Tufting Co., 239 S.E.2d at 28 (emphasis added).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Atwood v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. (2×)
Ill. App. Ct. · 2006 · confidence medium
Queen Tufting Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., 239 Ga. 843, 844 , 239 S.E.2d 27, 28 (1977).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Atwood v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. (2×)
Ill. App. Ct. · 2006 · confidence medium
Queen Tufting Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., 239 Ga. 843, 844 , 239 S.E.2d 27, 28 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Queen Tufting Company
v.
Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company
32449.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Oct 20, 1977.
239 S.E.2d 27
Mitchell, Mitchell, Coppedge, Boyett & Wester, William I. Boyett, for appellant., Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman & Ashmore, Frederick E. Link, Robert L. Pennington, for appellee.
Hall, Hill, Marshall.
Cited by 15 opinions  |  Published
Hall, Justice.

This court granted the application for writ of certiorari to review the decision and judgment of the Court of Appeals in Queen Tufting Co. v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 141 Ga. App. 792 (234 SE2d 354) (1977). The[*844] Court of Appeals affirmed the grant of a summary judgment for the defendant on the ground that plaintiffs failure to file suit within the time stated in the insurance contract barred the action. The provision of the contract stated: "No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any Court of law or equity unless the insured shall have fully complied with all the requirements of this policy, nor unless commenced within twelve (12) months next after the happening of the loss, unless a longer period of time is provided by applicable statute.”

Argued September 12, 1977 Decided October 20, 1977. Mitchell, Mitchell, Coppedge, Boyett & Wester, William I. Boyett, for appellant. Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman & Ashmore, Frederick E. Link, Robert L. Pennington, for appellee.

The loss occurred approximately two and one-half years prior to the filing of the suit.

A majority of the Court of Appeals held that Code § 3-705, which provides for a six-year limitation on contract actions, was inapplicable. Three judges dissented. In our opinion, Code § 3-705 is the applicable statute.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Hill, J., who concurs in the judgment only, and Marshall, J., who is disqualified.