Bumpus v. Gunter, 450 U.S. 1003 (1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Bumpus v. Gunter, 450 U.S. 1003 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
160 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Davis v. State (alacrimapp, 1998-05-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Davis v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lake v. State , 390 So.2d 1088 (Ala.Cr.App. 1980), cert. denied, 390 So.2d 1093 (Ala. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1004 , 101 S.Ct. 1715 , 68 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); Martin v. State , 29 Ala. App. 395 , 196 So. 753 (1940).'" Edwards v. State , 668 So.2d 167 , 169 (Ala.Cr.App. 1995) (quoting Hollis v. State , 417 So.2d 617 , 620 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982)). "`The [trial] judge is responsible for giving the jury the guidance by which it can make appropriate conclusions from the testimony.
discussed Cited "see" Edwards v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lake v. State, 390 So.2d 1088 (Ala.Cr.App.1980), cert. denied, 390 So.2d 1093 (Ala.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1004 , 101 S.Ct. 1715 , 68 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); Martin v. State, 29 Ala.App. 395 , 196 So. 753 (1940).
discussed Cited "see" Mayfield v. Maloney (2×)
D. Mass. · 1990 · signal: accord · confidence high
Upon review, a challenged jury instruction “may not be judged in artificial isolation, but must be viewed in the context of the overall charge,” Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141, 147 , 94 S.Ct. 396, 400 , 38 L.Ed.2d 368 (1973); accord Bumpus v. Gunter, 635 F.2d 907, 911 (1st Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1003 , 101 S.Ct. 1714 , 68 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. George Olmstead (2×)
1st Cir. · 1987 · signal: accord · confidence high
This court has recognized the central role of the trial court in instructing the jury, cf. Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141, 149 , 94 S.Ct. 396, 401 , 38 L.Ed.2d 268 (1973), and has left to the trial judge “the choice among acceptable linguistic alternatives.” Tsoumas v. State of New Hampshire, 611 F.2d 412, 414 (1st Cir.1980); accord Bumpus v. Gunter, 635 F.2d 907, 910 (1st Cir.1980) (“Unless this Court is to end up imposing pattern jury instructions, we must tolerate a reasonable range of expression, some or even much of which may not suit our fancy.”), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1003 , 10…
discussed Cited "see" Hollis v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lake v. State , 390 So.2d 1088 (Ala.Cr.App. 1980), cert. denied, 390 So.2d 1093 (Ala. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1004 , 101 S.Ct. 1715 , 68 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); Martin v. State , 29 Ala. App. 395 , 196 So. 753 (1940).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hellum v. Warden, United States Penitentiary-Leavenworth (2×)
8th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Bumpus v. Gunter, 635 F.2d 907, 914-15 (1st Cir.1980) (upholding separate seating for defendant), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1003 , 101 S.Ct. 1714 , 68 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); Dorman v. United States, 435 F.2d 385, 397-98 (D.C.Cir.1970) (placement of uniformed guards behind defendant did not create unfair prejudice).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Randy Lee Hellum v. Warden, United States Penitentiary-Leavenworth Hubert H. Humphrey, Iii, Attorney General, State of Minnesota (2×)
8th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Bumpus v. Gunter, 635 F.2d 907, 914-15 (1st Cir.1980) (upholding separate seating for defendant), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1003 , 101 S.Ct. 1714 , 68 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); Dorman v. United States, 435 F.2d 385, 397-98 (D.C.Cir.1970) (placement of uniformed guards behind defendant did not create unfair prejudice). 18 Nonetheless, Hellum contends that the "unprecedented" collection of measures created an impermissible risk of prejudice in this case.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Oses v. Com. of Mass. (2×)
D. Mass. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
On habeas corpus review, the question for this court is “whether the impropriety [of the charge at issue] actually infected the entire trial and rendered petitioner’s conviction violative of constitutional due process.” Smith v. Butler, 696 F.Supp. 748, 759 (D.Mass.1988), aff'd 879 F.2d 853 (1st Cir.) (table), cert. denied 493 U.S. 895 , 110 S.Ct. 245 , 107 L.Ed.2d 196 (1989); see also Bumpus v. Gunter, 635 F.2d 907, 913 (1st Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1003 , 101 S.Ct. 1714 , 68 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981) (question of whether “imperfections in the instant jury charge were ... of such ma…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bumpus
v.
Gunter
No. 80-6124.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1981.
450 U.S. 1003
Published

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.