green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
13.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1989 ·
…a finding is clearly erroneous when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Lisa Ann BURNS, Appellant, v. McGREGOR ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee
(2×)
Swift, Words and Women 109 (1977)); see also Andrews v. City of Philadelphia, 895 F.2d 1469, 1485 (3d Cir.1990) (holding that “pervasive use of derogatory and insulting terms relating to women generally and addressed to female employees personally may serve as evidence of a hostile environment”); Ellison v. Brady, 924 F.2d 872, 877-78 (9th Cir.1991) (same); but see Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611 (6th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Taco Cabana International, Inc. v. Two Pesos, Inc.
But see AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1537 (11th Cir.1986) (noting exception to general rule of totality when third party use of one or more elements of plaintiff’s trade dress is so extensive and so similar to plaintiff's that it impairs ability of consumers to identify source), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987). 5 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
McKay v. Mad Murphy's, Inc.
that kraft in fact used the mark in 1980 does not mean that kraft intended to use mark in 1978.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hopkins v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
the equal harassment of both genders does not escape the purview of title vii
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Conopco, Inc. v. May Dept. Stores Co.
it takes very little evidence to establish the existence of the actual confusion factor
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Paul Kordenbrock v. Gene Scroggy, Warden, Kentucky State Penitentiary
(6×)
also: Cited "see"
a finding is clearly erroneous when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
David S. Boutros v. Canton Regional Transit Authority
(2×)
The Risinger panel indicated that Davis was a departure from Patterson v. McLean Credit Union and Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S. Ct.1983, 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987), in that the test laid out in Rabidue should apply to both racial and sexual harassment claims.
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. University of Notre Dame
(2×)
See McNeil v. Economics Laboratory, Inc., 800 F.2d 111, 118 (7th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987), overruled on other grounds by Coston v. Plitt Theatres, Inc., 860 F.2d 834 (7th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Klemencic v. Ohio State University
(2×)
See Yeary v. Goodwill Industries-Knoxville, Inc., 107 F.3d 443, 445 (6th Cir.1997), citing Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 619-20 (6th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Benhardt v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF WYANDOTTE
(2×)
It is not designed to purge the workplace of vulgarity.” Baskerville, 50 F.3d at 430 ; see Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 584 F.Supp. 419, 430 (E.D.Mich.1984) (noting that Title VII was not “designed to bring about a magical transformation in the social mores of American workers”), aff'd, 805 F.2d 611 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hegwood v. Pharmacia/Upjohn
(2×)
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 620 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987); Gagne v. Northwestern National Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Douglas v. Mitzelfeld's, Inc.
(2×)
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987); Jones v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., 871 F.Supp. 305 (E.D.Mich.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Scannell v. Bel Air Police Department
(2×)
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 620 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987) (proof that the harassment significantly affects plaintiffs psychological well-being essential element of harassment claim); but see Harris, 510 U.S. at 22 , 114 S.Ct. at 370-71 (“But Title VII comes into play before the harassing conduct leads to a nervous breakdown.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Pooler
See State v. Loyd, 489 So.2d 898 (La.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1042 , 107 S.Ct. 1984 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barnes v. Breeden
(2×)
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 621 (6th Cir.1986) cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987). 13 Title VII affords an employee the right to work in an environment free from discriminatory intimidation, ridicule and insult.
discussed
Cited "see"
Foxworthy v. Custom Tees, Inc.
See AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 805 F.2d 974, 987-88 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1986); see also E & J Gallo, 782 F.Supp. at 464-65 (confusion more likely where products are impulse purchases, such as wine).
cited
Cited "see"
Taylor Made Golf Co. v. Trend Precision Golf, Inc.
See AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1535-1537 (11th Cir.1986) (analyzing trade dress infringement), cer t. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wildlife Express Corporation v. Carol Wright Sales, Incorporated
See AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531 , 1541 n. 46 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987) (rejecting de novo review, adhering to “clear error” for review of finding of similarity in trade dress infringement). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Baab v. AMR Services Corp.
(2×)
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lucille R. Kauffman v. Allied Signal, Inc., Autolite Division
(2×)
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 618 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987); Yates v. Avco Corp., 819 F.2d 630, 634 (6th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
John E. Morgan v. Massachusetts General Hospital
(2×)
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 620 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chace v. Champion Spark Plug Co.
(2×)
See McNeil v. Economics Laboratory, Inc., 800 F.2d 111, 118 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cerveceria Centroamericana, S.A. v. Cerveceria India, Inc.
(2×)
Remy Martin & Co., S.A. v. Shaw-Ross Int’l Imports, Inc., 756 F.2d 1525, 1532 , 225 USPQ 1131, 1136 (11th Cir.1985); see AmBrit Inc. v. Kraft Inc. 805 F.2d 974 , 994 & n. 106, 1 USPQ2d 1161, 1177 & n. 106 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987).
examined
Cited "see"
Elizabeth M. Paroline v. Unisys Corporation Edgar L. Moore
(4×)
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 620 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Nevins
See White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Williams, 810 F.2d 844, 848-52 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1060 , 107 S.Ct. 940 , 93 L.Ed.2d 990 (1987); accord Central Machinery v. Arizona, 152 Ariz. 134 , 730 P.2d 843, 853-54 (1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1042 , 107 S.Ct. 1984 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Nevins
See White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Williams, 810 F.2d 844, 848-52 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1060 , 107 S.Ct. 940 , 93 L.Ed.2d 990 (1987); accord Central Machinery v. Arizona, 152 Ariz. 134 , 730 P.2d 843, 853-54 (1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1042 , 107 S.Ct. 1984 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cullman Ventures, Inc. v. Columbian Art Works, Inc.
Harland Co. v. Clarke Checks, Inc., 711 F.2d 966, 977 (11th Cir.1983); see Ambrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1543 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hunter v. Countryside Ass'n for the Handicapped, Inc.
(2×)
See McNeil v. Economics Laboratory, Inc., 800 F.2d 111, 118 (7th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Clamp Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Enco Manufacturing Company, Inc., Colex, Inc.
See Ambrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1546 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987); Tandy Corp. v. Malone & Hyde, Inc., 769 F.2d 362, 365-66 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1158 , 106 S.Ct. 2277 , 90 L.Ed.2d 719 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrew W. Hansard, Cross-Appellant v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., D/B/A Pepsi-Cola Bottling Group, Cross-Appellee
(2×)
See McNeil v. Economics Laboratory, Inc., 800 F.2d 111, 118 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987); Wildman v. Lerner Stores Corp., 771 F.2d 605, 614-16 (1st Cir.1985); Maxfield v. Sinclair Int'l, 766 F.2d 788 , 795-97 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1057 , 106 S.Ct. 796 , 88 L.Ed.2d 773 (1986); O’Donnell v. Georgia Osteopathic Hosp., Inc., 748 F.2d 1543, 1551 (11th Cir.1984); Whittlesey v. Union Carbide Corp., 742 F.2d 724, 726 (2d Cir.1984); Davis, 742 F.2d at 922-23 ; EEOC v. Prudential Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Clayton v. Howard Johnson Franchise Systems, Inc.
See Ambrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1544 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wesco Manufacturing, Inc. v. Tropical Attractions Of Palm Beach, Inc.
See Ambrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1538 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987); Conagra, Inc. v. Singleton, 743 F.2d 1508, 1514 (11th Cir.1984); Jellibeans, Inc. v. Skating Clubs of Georgia, Inc., 716 F.2d 833, 840 (11th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wesco Manufacturing, Inc. v. Tropical Attractions of Palm Beach, Inc.
See Ambrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1538 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987); Conagra, Inc. v. Singleton, 743 F.2d 1508, 1514 (11th Cir.1984); Jellibeans, Inc. v. Skating Clubs of Georgia, Inc., 716 F.2d 833, 840 (11th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brunswick Corporation v. Spinit Reel Company
See AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1546 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987) (implying that delay of less than two years would not constitute laches); Piper Aircraft Corp. v. Wag-Aero, Inc., 741 F.2d 925, 933 (7th Cir.1984) (two years has rarely been held sufficient delay to establish laches); Black Hills Jewelry Mfg. v. Gold Rush, Inc., 633 F.2d 746 , 754 (8th Cir.1980) (eighteen months between defendant's first use of trade name and plaintiff's suit was insufficient delay to establish laches); Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. Veb Carl Zeiss …
discussed
Cited "see"
Brunswick Corp. v. Spinit Reel Co.
See AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1546 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987) (implying that delay of less than two years would not constitute laches); Piper Aircraft Corp. v. Wag-Aero, Inc., 741 F.2d 925, 933 (7th Cir.1984) (two years has rarely been held sufficient delay to establish laches); Black Hills Jewelry Mfg. v. Gold Rush, Inc., 633 F.2d 746 , 754 (8th Cir.1980) (eighteen months between defendant’s first use of trade name and plaintiff’s suit was insufficient delay to establish laches); Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. Veb Carl Zeiss…
discussed
Cited "see"
Sterling Rault, Sr. v. Robert H. Butler, Sr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent
See Wingo v. Blackburn, 783 F.2d 1046, 1051 (5th Cir.1986), *307 cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 1984 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987); Lowenfield; Berry v. Phelps, 819 F.2d 511, 516-17 (5th Cir.), stay of execution denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 3179 , 96 L.Ed.2d 668 (1987); Celestine v. Butler, 823 F.2d 74, 79 , (5th Cir. 1987), stay of execution denied, — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 6 , — L.Ed.2d- (1987); Watson v. Butler, 823 F.2d 842 ,-(5th Cir., 1987), stay denied by equally divided vote, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 6 , — L.Ed.2d -(1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
William E. Gilliam v. Armtex, Inc., William E. Gilliam v. Armtex, Inc.
(2×)
See McNeil v. Economics Laboratory, Inc., 800 F.2d 111 , 117 & n. 8 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Micromuse, Inc. v. MICROMUSE, PLC
See also Am-Brit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1550 , 1 USPQ2d 1161, 1177 (11th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dorricott v. Fairhill Center for Aging
(2×)
See also Fleenor v. Hewitt Soap Co., 81 F.3d 48, 50 (6th Cir.1996) (quoting Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 618-19 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stacy v. Shoney's Incorporated
(2×)
See, e.g., Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611 (6th Cir.1986) (Sixth Circuit did not find actionable sexual harassment where (1) male supervisor referred to a female manager as “whore,” “cunt,” “pussy,” and “tits” and stated “all that bitch needs is a good lay,” and (2) the Company forced her to sit with female hourly employees during meetings, forbid her taking clients to lunch, and tolerated posters of scantily clad women in work areas), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987); Baskerville v. Culligan Intern.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Van Jelgerhuis v. Mercury Finance Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Brooms v. Regal Tube Co., 881 F.2d 412, 419 (7th Cir.1989) (endorsing objective and subjective analysis for hostile environment claim and listing factors for consideration endorsed by Sixth Circuit as including “the background and experience of the plaintiff [and] her coworkers”) (citing Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987); Dey, 28 F.3d 1446, 1456 (noting that general, gender-related comments not directed specifically at plaintiff would be actionable under Title VII) (citing 58 Fed.Reg…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Webb
See, e.g., Wingo v. Blackburn, 783 F.2d 1046, 1052 (5th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1042 , 107 S. Ct. 1984 , 95 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark Const. Co., Inc. v. Pena
SunAmerica Corp. v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada, 77 F.3d 1325, 1347-48 , 1996 WL 91227 at *21 (11th Cir. March 19, 1996); see also AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1545 (11th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987); Kansas v. Colorado, — U.S. -, -, 115 S.Ct. 1733, 1742 , 131 L.Ed.2d 759 (1995) (“The defense of laches ‘requires proof of (1) lack of diligence by the party against whom the defense is asserted, and (2) prejudice to the party asserting the defense.’ ”) (quoting Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265, 282 , 81 S.Ct.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Krueger International, Inc. v. Nightingale Inc.
The Sea-brook test asks “whether the design, shape or combination of elements is so unique, unusual or unexpected in this market that one can assume without proof that it will automatically be perceived by customers as an indiei[um] of origin.” 1 McCarthy, Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 8.02[4] (emphasis added); see also AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531 (11th Cir.1986) (applying Seabrook test to product design), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Laboratorios Roldan, C. Por A. v. Tex International, Inc.
See also AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1545 (11th Cir.1986) (affirming district court’s finding of trade dress infringement), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987); Exxon Corp. v. Texas Motor Exchange, Inc., 628 F.2d 500, 504 (5th Cir.1980); Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Conner, 645 F.Supp. 484, 488 (S.D.Fla.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
66 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 13, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,344, 18 Employee Benefits Cas. 2408 Thomas Dean Smith, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. World Insurance Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee
(2×)
O'Donnell v. Georgia Osteopathic Hosp., Inc., 748 F.2d 1543, 1550 (11th Cir.1984) ("Logic mandates, of course, that an unreasonably refused offer of reinstatement will preclude recovery of both frontpay and backpay"); see also Hybert v. Hearst Corp., 900 F.2d 1050, 1055 (7th Cir.1990) (quoting McNeil v. Economics Lab., Inc., 800 F.2d 111, 118 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. World Insurance
(2×)
O’Donnell v. Georgia Osteopathic Hosp., Inc., 748 F.2d 1543, 1550 (11th Cir.1984) (“Logic mandates, of course, that an unreasonably refused offer of reinstatement will preclude recovery of both frontpay and backpay”); see also Hybert v. Hearst Corp., 900 F.2d 1050, 1055 (7th Cir.1990) (quoting McNeil v. Economics Lab., Inc., 800 F.2d 111, 118 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. City of Cookeville
(2×)
“Front pay is an ‘equitable remedy,’ and, if determined by the court, is a matter of discretion, and the court’s decision will be overturned on appeal only if it constitutes an abuse of discretion.” Graefenhain v. Pabst Brewing Co., 870 F.2d 1198, 1201 (7th Cir.1989); see also McNeil v. Economics Lab., Inc., 800 F.2d 111, 119 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987). 1 The standard for reviewing a front pay award is “whether any reasonable person could [dis]agree with the district court.” United States v. $103,387.27 in U.S. Currency, 8…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. City of Cookeville
(2×)
United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 375 , 68 S.Ct. 525, 532 , 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948). 44 "Front pay is an 'equitable remedy,' and, if determined by the court, is a matter of discretion, and the court's decision will be overturned on appeal only if it constitutes an abuse of discretion." Graefenhain v. Pabst Brewing Co., 870 F.2d 1198, 1201 (7th Cir.1989); see also McNeil v. Economics Lab., Inc., 800 F.2d 111, 119 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987). 1 The standard for reviewing a front pay award is "whether any reasonable perso…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank C. Pasternak Judith Pasternak (92-1681/1682) Anthony J. Cutaia Diane Cutaia David G. Koehlinger (92-1681) v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
(2×)
See also, Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 616 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rabidue
v.
Osceola Refining Co., a Division of Texas-American Petrochemicals, Inc.
v.
Osceola Refining Co., a Division of Texas-American Petrochemicals, Inc.
No. 86-1472.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 4, 1987.
Cited by 183 opinions | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of Michigan Trial Lawyers Association for leave to file[*1042] a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.