green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.3 score
“remedy provided is not solely civil; two thirds of the recovery is not remedial and inevitably presupposes a punitive purpose”
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Securities Litigation
remedy provided is not solely civil; two thirds of the recovery is not remedial and inevitably presupposes a punitive purpose
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Finkielstain v. Seidel
See Andrea Theatres, Inc. v. Theatre Confections, Inc., 787 F.2d 59, 62 (2d Cir.1986); Levy v. Lewis, 635,F.2d 960 (2d Cir.1980); Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 222 F.2d 184 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 825 , 76 S:Ct. 52, 100 L.Ed. 737 (1955); Stoller v. Baldwin-United Corp., [1984] Fed.Sec.L.Rep. 1191, 678 (S.D.Oh.1984); Certified Group, Inc. v. First Variable, [1981-82] Fed.Sec.L.Rep. 1198,242 (D.D.C.1981); cf. Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, 463 U.S. 545, 560 , 103 S.Ct. 3201, 3210 , 77 L.Ed.2d 837 (1983) {Colorado River abstention improper if “there was no jurisdiction in…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Jerome H. Moore and Mildred v. Moore v. United States of America, Jerome H. Moore and Mildred v. Moore v. United States
S.Ct. 53, 100 L.Ed. 737 (1955).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hartwick College v. United States
See Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 222 F.2d 184, 188 , (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 350 U.S. 825 , 76 S.Ct. 52 , 100 L.Ed. 737 (1955); Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 28(3); Note, The Collateral Estoppel Effect of Prior State Court Findings in Cases Within Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction, 91 Harv.L.Rev. 1281 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rx Data Corporation, a New York Corporation v. Department of Social Services, an Agency of the State of New York
Abramson v. Pennwood Investment Corp., 392 F.2d 759, 762 (2d Cir. 1968) (securities laws); see Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 222 F.2d 184 (2d Cir.) (antitrust laws), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 825 , 76 *197 S.Ct. 52, 100 L.Ed. 737 (1955); Note, The Collateral Estoppel Effect of Prior State Court Findings in Cases Within Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction, 91 Harv.L.Rev. 1281, 1286-90 (1978). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter A. Lisowski
See Gariepy v. United States, 220 F.2d 252, 260 (6th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 825 , 76 S.Ct. 53 , 100 L.Ed. 737 ; Pearson v. United States, 147 F.2d 950, 952-953 (9th Cir. 1945); Paschen v. United States, 70 F.2d 491, 503 (7th Cir. 1934).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Genty v. Resolution Trust Corp.
See, e.g., Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 222 F.2d 184, 189 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 825 , 76 S.Ct. 52 , 100 L.Ed. 737 (1955).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank Genty v. Resolution Trust Corporation
See, e.g., Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 222 F.2d 184, 189 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 825 , 76 S.Ct. 52 , 100 L.Ed. 737 (1955). 49 The characterization of statutory multiple damages as a form of civil punishment has a long and venerable history in American jurisprudence.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lloyd L. Hayes, Hayes, Inc. v. T. G. Solomon, Gulf States Theatres, Inc.
Compare also Straus v. American Publishers’ Ass’n., 201 F. 306 (2d Cir. 1912), appeal dismissed, 235 U.S. 716 , 35 S.Ct. 197 , 59 L.Ed. 438 (1914), with Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 222 F.2d 184 (2d Cir.), on rehearing, 222 F.2d 195 , cert. denied, 350 U.S. 825 , 76 S.Ct. 52 , 100 L.Ed. 737 (1955). 20 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Mannex Corporation v. Charlton P. Rozands, Etc.
Compare, e. g., Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 2 Cir. 1955, 222 F.2d 184 , cert. den. 350 U.S. 825 , 76 S.Ct. 52 , 100 L.Ed. 737 , and Mach-Tronics Inc. v. Zirpoli, 9 Cir. 1963, 316 F.2d 820 , 833, with Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc., 1929, 279 U.S. 388 , 49 S.Ct. 356 , 73 L.Ed. 752 , and Connelly v. Balkwill, 6 Cir. 1960, 279 F.2d 685 , aff'g 174 F.Supp. 49 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. New York City Transit Authority
Compare Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 222 F.2d 184 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 825 , 76 S.Ct. 52 , 100 L.Ed. 737 (1955), where the grant to the federal courts of exclusive jurisdiction was said to preclude giving res judicata effect to a state decision, and Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Co., 320 U.S. 661, 670 , 64 S.Ct. 268 , 88 L.Ed. 376 (1943), where full enforcement of res judicata concepts might have allowed violation of the anti-trust laws.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph Curran, Individually and on Behalf of All the Members of the National Maritime Union of America, Afl-Cio v. Melvin R. Laird
See also Leighton v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 217 , 221 F.2d 91 , cert. denied 350 U.S. 825 , 76 S.Ct. 54 , 100 L.Ed. 737 (1955) (SEC’s refusal to assume jurisdiction over sale of American Express travelers checks is action committed by law to agency discretion and therefore removed from the APA’s review • provisions.) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James D. Harris v. United States
See also McFee v. United States, 206 F.2d 872, 876 (9 Cir. 1953), vacated, 348 U.S. 905 , 75 S.Ct. 311 , 99 L.Ed. 710 (1955) reaff’d, 221 F. 2d 807 (9th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 825 , 76 S.Ct. 53 , 100 L.Ed. 737 (1955), in which we held that where attorneys acted in the capacity of a transmitter of funds, they stood in the same position as a banker, and no confidential relationship arose.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Levy v. Alexander
Compare Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp’n, 2 Cir., 1955, 222 F.2d 184 , certiorari denied Walsh v. Lyons, 1955, 350 U.S. 825 , 76 S.Ct. 52 , 100 L.Ed. 737 . 2.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gariepy
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 103.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1955.
William E. Leahy for petitioner. Solicitor General SobelojJ and Assistant Attorney General Holland for the United States.
Published
Citer courts: C.D. California (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.