Merritt v. Park, 108 U.S. 109 (1883). · Go Syfert
Search
Merritt v. Park, 108 U.S. 109 (1883). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Boyd v. Consol Island Creek Coal (wvsd, 2017-11-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1901 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1901 1963 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Boyd v. Consol Island Creek Coal
S.D.W. Va · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed. 669 (1971).
discussed Cited "see" Texas Employers' Insurance Association v. Leroy Jackson
5th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Merrell Dow at ----, 106 S.Ct. at 3234, 92 L.Ed.2d at 660 ("The significance ... that there is no federal private cause of action [under the FDCA] thus cannot be overstated"). 16 Beginning with Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed. 669 (1971), Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971), Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82 , 91 S.Ct. 674 , 27 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971), and continuing through the more recent cases of Steffel v. Thompson, 415 U.S. 452 , 94 S.Ct. 1209 , 39 L.Ed.2d 505 (1974), Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc., 422 U.S. 922 , 95 S.Ct. 2561 , 45 L.Ed.2d …
cited Cited "see" State v. Suwannee County Development Authority of Suwannee County
Fla. · 1960 · signal: see · confidence high
See City of Ottawa v. Carey, 1883, 108 U.S. 110 , 2 S.Ct. 361 , 27 L.Ed. 669 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Santa Fe Land Improvement Co. v. City of Chula Vista
S.D. Cal. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed. 669 (1971). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MERRITT, Collector,
v.
PARK & Another
711.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 19, 1883.
108 U.S. 109
■Mr. SoKcit&r- General Phillips for collector., Mr. iEd/wmd Hartley and Mr. Walter H. Colemcm for appellees.
Blatchford.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Me. Justice Blatchford

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit to recover back duties exacted by the plaintiff in error, as collector of the port of New York, on glass bottles imported in March, 1879, from London. The bottles contained beer, and the defendant below exacted a specific* duty of 35 cents a gallon on the beer, .and also a duty of 30 per cent, ad valorem on the' bottles. The bottles were the ordinary ale bottles of commerce. The circuit court directed a verdict for the plaintiffs, and they had a judgment, to review which the collector brought this’writ of error.

The question involved is the same, and arose under the same statutory provisions, as in the case of Schmidt v. Badger, 107 U. S. 85. It ivas there held that such duty on the bottles, in addition to such duty on the beer and ale contained in them, was a laAvful duty. That decision governs the present case, and the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the case is remanded to that court, Avith directions to grant a new trial.