In re Schofield, 193 U.S. 667 (1904). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Schofield, 193 U.S. 667 (1904). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mar-Son, Inc. v. Terwaho Enterprises, Inc. (nd, 1977-10-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Mar-Son, Inc. v. Terwaho Enterprises, Inc.
N.D. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See, i. e., Weeks v. International Trust Co., 125 F. 370 (1st Cir. 1903), error dismissed for want of jurisdiction, 193 U.S. 667 , 24 S.Ct. 853 , 48 L.Ed. 839 (1904); Inter *293 national Trust Co. v. Weeks, 139 F. 5 (1st Cir. 1905), affirmed, 203 U.S. 364 , 27 S.Ct. 69 , 51 L.Ed. 224 (1906); Benson v. Iowa Bake-Rite Co., 207 Iowa 410 , 221 N.W. 464 (1928).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ex parte. In the Matter of Arthur P. Schofield
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 29, 1904.
193 U.S. 667
Burke, Corliss, Guy, Motion, Opposing, Petitioner, Solicitor, Support.
Published

Motion for leave to file petition for a writ of habeas corpus denied.

Mr. John Burke and Mr. Guy C. H. Corliss for petitioner in support of motion. Mr.- Solicitor General Hoyt opposing.