green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Citizens Energy Coalition of Indiana, D/B/A Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana v. Theodore L. Sendak, Attorney General of Indiana
(2×)
See NAACP v. Thompson, 357 F.2d 831, 833 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 385 U.S. 820 , 87 S.Ct. 45 , 17 L.Ed.2d 58 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Citizens Energy Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. Sendak
See NAACP v. Thompson, 357 F.2d 831, 833 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 820 , 87 S.Ct. 45 , 17 L.Ed.2d 58 (1966). 11.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McDaniel
Accord, Smith v. United States, 356 F.2d 868 (Eighth Cir. 1966) cert. denied, 385 U.S. 820 , 87 S.Ct. 44 , 17 L.Ed.2d 58 (1966); Hammond v. Brown, 323 F.Supp. 326 (N.D.Ohio 1971) affd, 450 F.2d 480 (Sixth Cir. 1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joanne Graham
(2×)
See Fabian v. United States, 358 F.2d 187, 192-93 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 821 , 87 S.Ct. 46 , 17 L.Ed.2d 58 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cole
See Smith v. United States, 356 F.2d 868 (8 Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 820 , 87 S.Ct. 44 , 17 L.Ed.2d 58 . 5 Judgments affirmed. .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Earl Thomas Cole, United States of America v. Mitchell Calvin McHenry United States of America v. Samuel Woodard, Jr. (A/k/a Joe Siefus)
See Smith v. United States, 356 F.2d 868 (8 Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 820 , 87 S.Ct. 44 , 17 L.Ed.2d 58 . 5 28 Judgments affirmed.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis Keith Fried
See, Smith v. United States, 356 F.2d 868 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 820 , 87 S.Ct. 44 , 17 L.Ed.2d 58 ; Sawyer v. United States, 312 F.2d 24 (8th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 837 , 83 S.Ct. 1888 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1058 ; La Duke v. United States, 253 F.2d 387 (8th Cir. 1958); Kitts v. United States, 243 F.2d 883 (8th Cir. 1957); Brunjes v. United States, 329 F.2d 339 (7th Cir. 1964); United States v. Lawrenson, 298 F.2d 880 (4th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, Lawrenson v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., 370 U.S. 913 , 82 S.Ct. 1260 , 8 L.Ed.2d 406 ; Purdom v. United States, 2…
discussed
Cited "see"
Dailey v. City of Lawton, Oklahoma
See National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Thompson, 5 Cir., 357 F.2d 831, 833 , cert. denied Johnson v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, 385 U.S. 820 , 87 S.Ct. 45 , 17 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dailey v. City of Lawton
See National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Thompson, 5 Cir., 357 F.2d 831, 833 , cert. denied Johnson v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, 385 U.S. 820 , 87 S.Ct. 45 , 17 L.Ed.2d 58 , and Woods v. Wright, 5 Cir., 334 F.2d 369, 374-375 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.
(2×)
See also Rich Products Corp. v. Mitchell Foods, Inc., 357 F.2d 176, 182 (2d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 821 , 87 S.Ct. 46 , 17 L.Ed.2d 58 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Devex Corporation v. General Motors Corporation
(2×)
See also Rich Products Corp. v. Mitchell Foods, Inc., 357 F.2d 176, 177, 182 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 821 , 87 S.Ct. 46 , 17 L.Ed.2d 58 (1966) (defendant infringed patent, where defendant substituted hydroxypropyl methyl, a cellulose, for the alkyl groups specified in the patent, the cellulose was one of the four essential ingredients in the patent, and the substitute chemical performed the same function as the chemical listed in the patent). 107 Here, the Special Master, in the role of fact finder, found, after weighing the evidence, that TKPP and TSP, when substituted for borax, pro…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
(2×)
See also Rich Products Corp. v. Mitchell Foods, Inc., 357 F.2d 176, 177, 182 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 821 , 87 S.Ct. 46 , 17 L.Ed.2d 58 (1966) (defendant infringed patent, where defendant substituted hydroxypropyl methyl, a cellulose, for the alkyl groups specified in the patent, the cellulose was one of the four essential ingredients in the patent, and the substitute chemical performed the same function as the chemical listed in the patent).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James John Malasanos
See, e.g., Smith v. United States, 356 F.2d 868 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 820 , 87 S.Ct. 44 , 17 L.Ed.2d 58 ; La Duke v. United States, 253 F.2d 387 (8th Cir. 1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eastern Electric, Inc. v. Seeburg Corporation
(2×)
Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. Kollsman Instrument Corp., supra note 26; see also Rich Products Corporation v. Mitchell Foods, Inc., 357 F.2d 176 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 821 , 87 S.Ct. 46 , 17 L.Ed.2d 58 (1966). 38 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
New England Enterprises, Inc. v. United States of America, Kenneth R. Bauer v. United States of America, Robert L. Marquis v. United States of America, Eugene L. Michaud v. United States
(2×)
Compare Fabian v. United States, 358 F.2d 187 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 821 , 87 S.Ct. 46 , 17 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
New England Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
Compare Fabian v. United States, 358 F.2d 187 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 385 U.S. 821 , 87 S.Ct. 46 , 17 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sule
v.
Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.
v.
Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.
No. 174.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1966.
J. Minos Simon for petitioner.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.