Sebolt v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 1017 (2015). · Go Syfert
Search
Sebolt v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 1017 (2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Bikundi (dcd, 2015-08-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bikundi
D.D.C. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Coffman, 574 Fed.Appx. 541, 561 (6th Cir.2014) ce rt. denied sub nom., Milby v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1019 , 190 L.Ed.2d 886 (2015) and — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1568 , 191 L.Ed.2d 641 (2015) (“Commingling is enough to expose the legitimate funds to forfeiture, if the commingling was done for the purpose of concealing the nature or" source of the taintéd funds (that is, if the Commingling was done to facilitate money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (a)(l)(B)(i)).”) (internal quotation and citation omitted); United States v. Puche, 350 F.3d 1137…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Philip Sebolt
4th Cir. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sebolt, 554 Fed.Appx. 200 (4th Cir.2014), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1017 , 190 L.Ed.2d 886 (2015).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Philip Michael SEBOLT
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 14–7541..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 2015.
135 S. Ct. 1017
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.