Garibo-Galeana v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 257 (2017). · Go Syfert
Search
Garibo-Galeana v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 257 (2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Evans (conn, 2018-08-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Evans
Conn. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
Emphasizing that multiple circuit courts of appeals had previously interpreted the civil rights restoration section of the three strikes law to be an affirmative defense, rather than an element of the offense, the Seventh Circuit concluded that "the [D]istrict [C]ourt properly decided whether [the defendant's] civil rights were restored because the underlying facts that could support that determination constitute an affirmative defense, not an element of the offense, and are not covered by Alleyne ." Id. ; see also, e.g., United States v. Blake , 858 F.3d 1134 , 1137 (8th Cir.) ( Alleyne did n…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mario GARIBO-GALEANA
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 17–5389..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2017.
138 S. Ct. 257
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.