green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
8.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1975 ·
…under the recent decisions of the united states supreme court in f.e.l.a. cases, speculation, conjecture and possibilities suffice to support a jury verdict.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Peter J. Zegan v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey
(2×)
Co., 7 Cir., 1957, 246 F.2d 834 ; but see 355 U.S. 897 , 78 S.Ct. 270 , 2 L.Ed.2d 193 for Mr. Justice Frankfurter’s comment on the Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari in that case. .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carlew v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR CO.
ot until this court explicitly holds that in 'fela cases, speculation, conjecture and possibilities suffice to support a jury verdict,' . . . is that to be assumed to be the law of this court
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dyson v. Sposeep
the seventh amendment ... applies to trial in the united states courts____ trial by jury in civil actions in state courts may be modified by a state or abolished altogether.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Landry v. Two R. Drilling Company
under the recent decisions of the united states supreme court in f.e.l.a. cases, speculation, conjecture and possibilities suffice to support a jury verdict.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Landry v. Two R. Drilling Co.
under the recent decisions of the united states supreme court in f.e.l.a. cases, speculation, conjecture and possibilities suffice to support a jury verdict.
discussed
Cited "see"
Franchi v. Farmholme, Inc.
(2×)
See Olesen v. Trust Co. of Chicago, 245 F.2d 522, 524 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 896 , 78 S. Ct. 270 , 2 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cooper v. County Board of Review of Grant County
(2×)
See Tyler Gas Service Company v. Federal Power Commission (1957) 101 U.S. App.D.C. 184, 247 F.2d 590 , cert. denied 355 U.S. 895 , 78 S.Ct. 263 , 2 L.Ed.2d 193 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United Gas Pipe Line Co.
v.
Tyler Gas Service Co.
v.
Tyler Gas Service Co.
No. 520.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 1957.
Thomas Fletcher and C. Huffman Lewis for petitioner. Bryce Rea, Jr., Thomas B. Ramey and Troy Smith for respondents.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Motion for leave to file brief of McMurrey Refining Co., as amicus curiae, denied. Certiorari denied.