green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.6 score
“a distinct and separate liability”
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Securities Northwest, Inc.
a distinct and separate liability
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. United States (In Re Smith)
See United States v. Molitor, 337 F.2d 917, 924 (9th Cir.1964), citing Bloom v. United States, 272 F.2d 215, 221 (9th Cir.1959), cert. denied, 363 U.S. 803 , 80 S.Ct. 1236 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1146 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Saxe
See Bloom v. United States, 272 F.2d 215 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 363 U.S. 803 , 80 S.Ct. 1236 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1146 (1950); Sherwood v. United States, 228 F.Supp. 247 (E.D.N.Y.1964); In re Haynes, 88 F.Supp. 379 (D.Kan.1948).
discussed
Cited "see"
Abrams v. United States
Accord, Bloom v. United States, 272 F.2d 215 (C.A. 9, 1959), cert. denied, 363 U. S. 803 , 80 S.Ct. 1236 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1146 (1960); Hewitt v. United States, 377 F.2d 921, 924 (C.A. 5, 1967); Scott v. United States, 354 F.2d 292 , 173 Ct.Cl. 650 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ben D. Spivak and David S. Shapiro v. United States
See Bloom v. United States, 272 F.2d 215 (9th Cir. 1959), cert. denied 362 U.S. 803 , 80 S.Ct. 1236 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1146 (1960); Horwitz v. United States, 236 F.Supp. 812 (S.D.N.Y.1964), aff’d 339 F.2d 877 (2d Cir. 1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert E. Burriss, Jr. v. Texaco, Inc.
Smith v. Lauritzen, 356 F.2d 171, 176 (3d Cir. 1966); see Walker v. United States Gypsum Co., 270 F.2d 857 (4th Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 363 U.S. 805 , 80 S.Ct. 1240 , 4 L.Ed. 2d 1148 (1960); Bass v. Commercial Credit Corp., 317 F.2d 910 (5th Cir. 1963); Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 56; Major v. McCurdy, 118 F.Supp. 537 (E.D.S.C. 1954) (South Carolina practice). 8 Moreover, since the ruling of the District Court eliminating the independent contractor defense from the case came at the conclusion of all the evidence, after Texaco had had a full opportunity to establish its affirmative defense, a remand for …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Slattery
See Bloom v. United States, 272 F.2d 215 (9th Cir. 1959), cert. den. 363 U.S. 803 , 80 S.Ct. 1236 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1146 ; Wiggins v. United States, 188 F.Supp. 374 (E.D.Tenn.1960). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
George D. Hartman, Jr. v. United States
Kelly v. Lethert, supra; see also the leading case of Bloom v. United States, 272 F.2d 215 (9th Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 363 U.S. 803 , 80 S.Ct. 1236 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1146 (1960).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Newsom
v.
Smyth, Superintendent, Virginia State Penitentiary
v.
Smyth, Superintendent, Virginia State Penitentiary
No. 453.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 31, 1960.
Petitioner pro se. A. S. Harrison, Jr., Attorney General of Virginia, and Thomas M. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Cited by 24 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia granted. Case transferred to appellate docket.