green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1991 ·
…in affirming the district court's application of the notice requirement in this case, we do not foreclose the possibility that a liberal application may, in other cases, be acceptable under our deferential standard for reviewing district court evidentiary rulings.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Santiago Panzardi-Lespier, A/K/A \Chago\""
(2×)
in affirming the district court's application of the notice requirement in this case, we do not foreclose the possibility that a liberal application may, in other cases, be acceptable under our deferential standard for reviewing district court evidentiary rulings.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ferguson v. Security Life of Denver Insurance
(2×)
See Wayne v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 730 F.2d 392, 401 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1159 , 105 S.Ct. 908 , 83 L.Ed.2d 922 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Via v. General Electric Co.
(2×)
See Wayne v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 730 F.2d 392, 400-02 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1159 , 105 S.Ct. 908 , 83 L.Ed.2d 922 (1985) (applying Tennessee law); Myers v. Hayes Intern.
discussed
Cited "see"
Allison v. ITE Imperial Corp.
(2×)
See Wayne v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 730 F.2d 392, 401-02 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1159 , 105 S.Ct. 908 , 83 L.Ed.2d 922 (1985). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Allison v. Ite Imperial Corporation
(2×)
See Wayne v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 730 F.2d 392, 401-02 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1159 , 105 S.Ct. 908 , 83 L.Ed.2d 922 (1985). 2. 70 Even though the statute is substantive, Mississippi choice of law rules preclude its application if it is repugnant to Mississippi law.
discussed
Cited "see"
White Ex Rel. White v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See Wayne v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 730 F.2d 392 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1159 , 105 S.Ct. 908 , 83 L.Ed.2d 922 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baldwin v. Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corp.
(2×)
See Lloyd v. Professional Realty Serv., 734 F.2d 1428 , 1433 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1159 , 105 S.Ct. 908 , 83 L.Ed.2d 922 (1985) (employee not authorized to testify as to statements regarding stock offers).
cited
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,472 Frank A. Beard and Edith F. Beard v. J.I. Case Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Tenneco, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
See id. at 400-02 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Kochins v. Linden-Alimak, Inc.
(2×)
Accord Wayne v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 730 F.2d 392, 403-04 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1159 , 105 S.Ct. 908 , 83 L.Ed.2d 922 (1985), in which the Fifth Circuit rejected the due process argument that § 29-28-103 unconstitutionally curtails access to the courts. .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goetz v. Glickman
Cities Service Co., 529 F.2d at 1029 (quoting Rodgers v. United States, 138 F.2d 992, 994 (6th Cir.1943)); see also Mulroy v. Block, 569 F.Supp. 256, 261 (N.D.N.Y.1983), aff'd per curiam, 736 F.2d 56 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1159 , 105 S.Ct. 907 , 83 L.Ed.2d 922 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kirby v. Tennessee Valley Authority
(2×)
See, e.g., Wayne v. TVA, 730 F.2d 392, 400 (5th Cir.1984), cert. de nied, 469 U.S. 1159 , 105 S.Ct. 908 , 83 L.Ed.2d 922 (1985); Smith v. TVA, 699 F.2d 1043, 1045 (11th Cir.1983); Kentucky Agric.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Harrington
(2×)
See also Barham, 794 F.Supp. at 191 (citing Wayne v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 730 F.2d 392 (5th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 1159 , 105 S.Ct. 908 , 83 L.Ed.2d 922 (1985)) (“When Congress has legislated on the subject, the legislation and not federal common law, will be deferred to.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lourdes High School of Rochester, Inc. v. Sheffield Brick & Tile Co.
(2×)
See Jewson v. Mayo Clinic, 691 F.2d 405, 411-12 (8th Cir.1982); see also Wayne v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 730 F.2d 392, 402-04 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1159 , 105 S.Ct. 908 , 83 L.Ed.2d 922 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lourdes High School of Rochester, Inc. v. Sheffield Brick & Tile Company Patzig Testing Laboratories Co., Inc., Peterson & Appel, Consulting Engineers Carlisle Peterson. Sheffield Brick & Tile Company v. W-Smith Architectural & Engineering Services, Inc., F/k/a Flad-Smith & Associates Architects & Engineers, Inc., W. Wayne Smith. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Sheffield Brick & Tile Company, an Iowa Corporation and Lourdes High School of Rochester, Inc
(2×)
See Jewson v. Mayo Clinic, 691 F.2d 405, 411-12 (8th Cir.1982); see also Wayne v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 730 F.2d 392, 402-04 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1159 , 105 S.Ct. 908 , 83 L.Ed.2d 922 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Habenicht v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Wayne v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 730 F.2d 392 (5th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 1159 , 105 S.Ct. 908 , 83 L.Ed.2d 922 (1985) (Tennessee statute of repose held substantive); Nieman v. Press & Equipment Sales Co., 588 F.Supp. 650 (S.D.Ohio 1984) (Colorado statute of repose held substantive); Bolick v. American Barmag Corp., 306 N.C. 364 , 293 S.E.2d 415 (1982) (N.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alabama
v.
Pruitt
v.
Pruitt
No. 84-715.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 14, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (2)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari before judgment denied.