green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
12.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1988 ·
…a jnov is improper if reasonable minds could differ over the verdict
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2004 ·
…where, as here, the attorney performs a function in the collective bargaining process that would otherwise be assumed by the union's business agents or representatives, the rationale behind the atkinson rule is squarely applicable.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1993 ·
…while there is no absolute definition of what is a reasonable time, we know that it may encompass 'months, occasionally a year or two, but not several years or a decade.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gisela Carino v. Marc Stefan, Esq Butsavage & Associates, LLC
(2×)
where, as here, the attorney performs a function in the collective bargaining process that would otherwise be assumed by the union's business agents or representatives, the rationale behind the atkinson rule is squarely applicable.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Washington Legal Foundation v. Lamar Alexander, Secretary of Education
(2×)
while there is no absolute definition of what is a reasonable time, we know that it may encompass 'months, occasionally a year or two, but not several years or a decade.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Oahu Gas Service, Inc. v. Pacific Resources Inc., Gasco, Inc.
(2×)
a jnov is improper if reasonable minds could differ over the verdict
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Nelson v. Bulso
In Wallace v. Herron, the plaintiff, an Indiana resident, sued three California attorneys and a California law firm in Indiana, alleging that by pursuing a lawsuit against the plaintiff in California, the defendants were liable for malicious prosecution. 778 F.2d 391, 392 (7th Cir.1985), cert, denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 *1245 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Walker
(2×)
See State v. Vessichio , 197 Conn. 644 , 653-60, 500 A.2d 1311 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed. 2d 187 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Raynor
(2×)
See State v. Vessichio , 197 Conn. 644 , 657, 500 A.2d 1311 (1985) (holding that although evidence of conspiracy "not overwhelming," jury reasonably could rely on evidence that defendant picked up coconspirators in van after completed drug sale to support finding that defendant was involved in conspiracy to sell cocaine), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986) ; see also State v. Stellato , 10 Conn.App. 447 , 454, 523 A.2d 1345 (1987) (jury may rely on defendant's conduct prior to, during, and after completed crime to infer defendant was member of conspiracy).
cited
Cited "see"
Revis v. State
See Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162 , 106 S.Ct. 1758 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Watkins v. Crescent Enterprises, LLC.
(2×)
See Nicholas v. Buchanan, 806 F.2d 305, 307 (1st Cir.1986) (plaintiffs “generalized ‘use of the mails, telephone, or other international communications simply do not qualify as purposeful activity invoking the benefits and protection of the [forum] state’ ”) [Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244 , (9th Cir.1985)], cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986); Scullin Steel Co. v. Nat’l Ry.
discussed
Cited "see"
Phillips v. Selig
(2×)
See Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1258-59 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986); Gates v. Local Union No. 144, Int’l Union of Operating Engin.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gwin v. NATIONAL MARINE ENGINEERS BENEFICIAL ASS'N
(2×)
See Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1258 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986); Montplaisir v. Leighton, 875 F.2d 1, 6 (1st Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anglo American Insurance Group, P.L.C. v. CalFed Inc.
(2×)
See Peterson v. Kennedy, 111 F.2d 1244, 1262 (9th Cir.1985) ("Both this court and the courts of California have concluded that ordinarily 'use of the mails, telephone, or other international communication simply do not qualify as purposeful activity invoking the benefits and protection of the [forum] state.' ”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986); Sher v. Johnson, 911 F.2d 1357, 1363 (9th Cir.1990) (declining to follow California law on jurisdiction, an issue of federal constitutional law, and finding that three trips to California, while…
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelson v. Silverman
(2×)
See Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1256 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Haggood
(2×)
See State v. Vessichio, 197 Conn. 644, 653-60 , 500 A.2d 1311 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S. Ct. 1642 , 90 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lee v. Denro, Inc.
See Wheeler v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 108 Ill.2d 502 , 92 Ill.Dec. 561, 565 , 485 N.E.2d 372, 376 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1641 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986); Petrik v. Monarch Printing Corp., 111 Ill.App.3d 502 , 67 Ill.Dec. 352, 356 , 444 N.E.2d 588, 592 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donna Erickson v. Pierce County John Ladenburg, Donna Erickson v. Pierce County John Ladenburg
(2×)
Transgo, 768 F.2d at 1014 ; accord Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1256 (9th Cir.1985) (directed verdict is “inappropriate if there is substantial evidence to support a verdict for the non-moving party”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Virginia H. Nesbit and the W. Wallace Nesbit Trust, Cross-Appellants v. Steve McNeil and Black & Company, Inc., Cross-Appellees
(2×)
See Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1256 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Price v. State
See Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162 , 106 S.Ct. 1758 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Nelson
(2×)
Although the state concedes that Morales’ testimony was inadmissible under this exception because the statements were not made in furtherance of a conspiracy; see State v. Vessichio, 197 Conn. 644 , 500 A.2d 1311 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S. Ct. 1642 , 90 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bradford v. Nagle
See Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1262 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 1187 (1986); Afram Export Corp. v. Metallurgiki Halyps, S.A., 772 F.2d 1358, 1362 (7th Cir.1985); Lakeside Bridge & Steel Co. v. Mountain States Construction Co., 597 F.2d 596 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1087 , 63 L.Ed.2d 325 (1980). 18 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank Sinatra v. National Enquirer, Inc., and Clinic La Prairie, S.A.
(2×)
Accord Wallace v. Herron, 778 F.2d 391 (7th Cir.) (Indiana had no personal jurisdiction over California attorneys sued by Indiana resident for malicious prosecution of a lawsuit in California), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Melvyn Siegel v. Richard E. Lyng, Secretary of Agriculture United States Department of Agriculture and United States of America
(2×)
See generally, Community Nutrition Institute v. Young, 773 F.2d 1356, 1364 (D.C.Cir.1985) (agency may dispense with hearing when no material issue of fact exists), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1123 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986).
examined
Cited "see"
Vicente L. Morta Fhp, Inc. v. Korea Insurance Corp.
(4×)
Discussion 11 A directed verdict will be granted only if, examining the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and drawing all reasonable inferences in its favor, "there is no substantial evidence to support a verdict for that party." Fabrica Inc. v. El Dorado Corp., 697 F.2d 890, 892 (9th Cir.1983); see Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1256 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986) (directed verdict proper where "the evidence permits only one reasonable conclusion as to the verdict").
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony P. Locricchio, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Legal Services Corp., Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees
(2×)
See Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1256 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986) (substantive analysis for directed verdict and JNOV are the same). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. Lee M. Thomas, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, American Mining Congress, National Coal Association, Intervenors
(2×)
See Community Nutrition Institute v. Young, 773 F.2d 1356, 1361 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1123 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986). 31 . 42 U.S.C. § 7607 (b)(1), which, in relevant part, provides that "[a] petition for review of ... any ... nationally applicable regulations promulgated, or final action taken, by the [EPA] Administrator under this chapter may be filed only in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia." 32 . 42 U.S.C. § 7604 . 33 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon
(2×)
See Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1252 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A.
(2×)
See Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1252 (9th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. World Color Press, Inc.
See Wheeler v. Caterpillar Tractor Co. (1985), 108 Ill. 2d 502 , 485 N.E.2d 372 , cert, dmied (1986), 475 U.S. 1122 , 90 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Brock, Secretary of Labor, Et Al.
See, in addition to the decision below and the cases cited above, the Second Circuit's decision in Consolidated Edison Co. v. Donovan, 673 F.2d 61 (1982), and the Illinois Supreme Court's ruling in Wheeler v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 108 Ill.2d 502 , 92 Ill.Dec. 561 , 485 N.E.2d 372 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1641 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brown
(2×)
State v. Gilligan, 92 Conn. 526 , 536–37, 103 A. 649 (1918); see also State v. Ves- sichio, 197 Conn. 644 , 664–65, 500 A.2d 1311 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S. Ct. 1642 , 90 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arnold v. Air Midwest, Inc.
(2×)
Accordingly, “[wjith monotonous regularity, court after court has cited Atkinson to foreclose state-law claims, however inventively cloaked, against individuals acting as union *862 representatives within the ambit of the collective bargaining process.” Montplaisir v. Leighton, 875 F.2d 1, 4 (1st Cir.1989); see also Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1257 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bishop v. Municipality of Anchorage
See, e.g., Wheeler v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 108 Ill.2d 502 , 92 Ill.Dec. 561 , 485 N.E.2d 372 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1641 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986) (employee wrongfully terminated after refusing to operate a unit containing live radioactive cobalt in violation of federal regulations).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
D'AGOSTINO v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
See, e.g., Wheeler v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 108 Ill.2d 502 , 92 Ill.Dec. 561 , 485 N.E.2d 372 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1641 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986) (finding clear mandate of public policy in regulations of Nuclear Regulatory Commission); Phipps v. Clark Oil & Ref.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John A. Peters v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company
(2×)
See, e.g., Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1253 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986); Castelli v. Douglas Aircraft Co., 752 F.2d 1480, 1482 (9th Cir.1985); see also Herring v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 894 F.2d 1020, 1023 (9th Cir.1990) ("[A] union does not breach its duty of fair representation to others as long as it proceeds on some reasoned basis."); Eichelberger v. NLRB, 765 F.2d 851, 856 (9th Cir.1985) (stating that " 'something more' " than negligence must be shown).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peters v. Burlington Northern Railroad
(2×)
See, e.g., Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1253 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986); Castelli v. Douglas Aircraft Co., 752 F.2d 1480, 1482 (9th Cir.1985); see also Herring v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 894 F.2d 1020, 1023 (9th Cir.1990) (“[A] union does not breach its duty of fair representation to others as long as it proceeds on some reasoned basis.”); Eichelberger v. NLRB, 765 F.2d 851, 856 (9th Cir.1985) (stating that “ ‘something more’ ” than negligence must be shown).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peters v. Burlington Northern Railroad
(2×)
See, e.g., Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1253 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986); Castelli v. Douglas Aircraft Co., 752 F.2d 1480, 1482 (9th Cir.1985); see also Herring v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 894 F.2d 1020, 1023 (9th Cir.1990) (“[A] union does not breach its duty of fair representation to others as long as it proceeds on some reasoned basis.”); Eichelberger v. NLRB, 765 F.2d 851, 856 (9th Cir.1985) (stating that “ ‘something more’ ” than negligence must be shown).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John A. Peters v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company
(2×)
See, e.g., Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1253 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986); Castelli v. Douglas Aircraft Co., 752 F.2d 1480, 1482 (9th Cir.1985); see also Herring v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 894 F.2d 1020, 1023 (9th Cir.1990) ("[A] union does not breach its duty of fair representation to others as long as it proceeds on some reasoned basis."); Eichelberger v. NLRB, 765 F.2d 851, 856 (9th Cir.1985) (stating that " 'something more' " than negligence must be shown).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul E. Montplaisir v. Richard J. Leighton
(4×)
See, e.g., Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1256-57 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S.Ct. 1642 , 90 L.Ed.2d 187 (1986); Universal Communications Corp. v. Burns, 449 F.2d 691, 693-94 (5th Cir.1971) (per curiam); Suwanchai v. Int’l Bhd. of Electrical Workers, 528 F.Supp. 851, 861-62 (D.N.H.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnny L. Banks v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, a Corporation Seattle Steel, Inc., a Corporation United Steelworkers of America, a Labor Organization
(2×)
In such a system, if individual employees are not to be deprived of all effective means of protecting their own interests, it must be the duty of the representative organization “to serve the interests of all members without hostility or discrimination toward any, to exercise its discretion with complete good faith and honesty, and to avoid arbitrary conduct.” DelCostello v. International Bhd. of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151 , 164 n. 14, 103 S.Ct. 2281 , 2290 n. 14, 76 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983) (quoting Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171, 177 , 87 S.Ct. 903, 909 , 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967)) (other citations omit…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ellice v. INA Life Insurance
(2×)
State v. Cooper, 182 Conn. 207, 211 , 438 A.2d 418 (1980).” State v. Hinckley, 198 Conn. 77, 88 , 502 A.2d 388 (1985); see also State v. Vessichio, 197 Conn. 644, 650 , 500 A.2d 1311 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1122 , 106 S. Ct. 1642 , 90 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wallace
v.
Herron
v.
Herron
No. 85-1462.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 1986.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.