Callanan v. United States, 350 U.S. 862 (1955). · Go Syfert
Search
Callanan v. United States, 350 U.S. 862 (1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
99 citation events across 31 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Williams v. City of Valdez (alaska, 1979-11-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Williams v. City of Valdez
Alaska · 1979 · confidence medium
Id. at 784 (footnotes omitted).
discussed Cited "see" Kevin H. Griffin v. James E. Aiken, Warden Attorney General of the State of South Carolina (2×)
4th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Whitener, 228 S.C. 244 , 89 S.E.2d 701 , cert. denied, 350 U.S. 861 , 76 S.Ct. 101 , 100 L.Ed. 764 (1955).
discussed Cited "see" Francina King v. United States (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Callanan v. United States, 223 F.2d 171 , 179 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 862 , 76 S.Ct. 102 , 100 L.Ed. 764 (1955) ; Richardson v. United States, 150 F.2d 58, 64 (6th Cir. 1945); 6 Wigmore, Evidence § 1808 (3d ed. 1940). .
discussed Cited "see" Northern California Pharmaceutical Association, a Corporation, and Donald K. Hedgpeth v. United States (2×)
9th Cir. · 1962 · signal: see · confidence high
See Callanan v. United States, 223 F.2d 171 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 862 , 76 S.Ct. 102 , 100 L.Ed. 764 (1955).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Theodore Caldes and Wellaine M. Lowery (2×)
9th Cir. · 1972 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Callanan v. United States, 223 F.2d 171 (8th Cir., 1955), cert. den. 350 U.S. 862 , 76 S.Ct. 102 , 100 L.Ed. 764 reh. den. 350 U.S. 926 , 76 S.Ct. 210 , 100 L.Ed. 810 (1955); United States v. Sweeney, 262 F.2d 272 (3rd Cir. 1959).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Musicians Union, Local No. 6 v. Superior Court (2×)
Cal. · 1968 · signal: see also · confidence low
In no ease has it been held or intimated that peaceful picketing activities in order to secure employment for union members is a violation of the Hobbs Act. "... [I]t was not the intention of the Congress [in enacting the Hobbs Act] to interfere with the exertion of peaceful economic pressures by a union through the medium of strikes to achieve legitimate labor objectives.” (United States v. Varlack (2d Cir. 1955) 225 2T.2d 665, 669; see also Callanan v. United States (8th Cir. 1955) 223 F.2d 171, 175 , cert. den. 350 U.S. 862 [ 100 L.Ed. 764 , 76 S.Ct. 102 ]; Bianchi v. United States (8th C…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Callanan
v.
United States
No. 256.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 1955.
350 U.S. 862
Thurman Arnold, Morris A. Shenker and Sidney M. Glazer for Callanan, and Harry H. Craig for Thompson, petitioners. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.