green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1900 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1900
1963
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Mattel, Inc. v. Bryant
This "[does] not expand federal jurisdiction beyond the bounds that the [Supreme] Court [has] recognized.” Id. at 347-48; see Phelps v. Oaks, 117 U.S. 236 , 6 S.Ct. 714 , 29 L.Ed. 888 (1886).
cited
Cited "see"
Klamath Irrigation District v. United States
See Phelps v. Oaks, 117 U.S. 236 , 6 S.Ct. 714 , 29 L.Ed. 888 (1886); Sweeney v. Athens Reg’l Med.
discussed
Cited "see"
New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Carey
Accord, Phelps v. Oaks, 117 U.S. 236 , 6 S.Ct. 714 , 29 L.Ed. 888 (1886); Formulabs, Inc. v. Hartley Pen Co., 318 F.2d 485 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 945 , 84 S.Ct. 352 , 11 L.Ed.2d 275 (1963); Northeast Clackamas County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co., 221 F.2d 329 (9th Cir. 1955); Virginia Elec. & Power Co. v. Carolina Peanut Co., 186 F.2d 816 (4th Cir. 1951); Kentucky Natural Gas Corp. v. Duggins, 165 F.2d 1011 (6th Cir. 1948); Division 525, Order of Ry.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brooks v. Sussex County State Bank
Co., 134 F.2d 890, 894 (4th Cir.1943); see also Phelps v. Oaks, 117 U.S. 236, 239 , 6 S.Ct. 714, 715 , 29 L.Ed. 888 (1886).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Almenares v. Wyman
See, e. g., Phelps v. Oaks, 117 U.S. 236 , 6 S.Ct. 714 , 29 L.Ed. 888 (1886); Dery v. Wyer, 265 F.2d 804 (2 Cir. 1959); Walmac Co. v. Isaacs, 220 F.2d 108 (1 Cir. 1955) 13 See Wilson v. American Chain & Cable Co., 364 F.2d 558 (3 Cir. 1966); Newman v. Freeman, 262 F.Supp. 106 (E.D.Pa.1966) 14 In Snyder v. Harris, 394 U.S. 332 , 89 S.Ct. 1053 , 22 L.Ed.2d 319 (1969), the Court, in two cases brought as class actions pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 23(b) (3), reaffirmed the traditional test permitting aggregation of claims only when the right asserted is "common and undivided." The Court made clear that i…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Almenares v. Wyman
See, e. g., Phelps v. Oaks, 117 U.S. 236 , 6 S.Ct. 714 , 29 L.Ed. 888 (1886); Dery v. Wyer, 265 F.2d 804 (2 Cir. 1959); Walmae Co. v. Isaacs, 220 F.2d 108 (1 Cir. 1955). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AKERS, Executor
v.
AKERS
v.
AKERS
442.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 8, 1886.
Mr. 8. Watson for defendant in error., No appearance for plaintiff,in error.
Waite.
Cited by 17 opinions | Published
Me. Chief Justiob Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
The order remanding this cause is affirmed on the authority of Gibson v. Bruce, 108 U. S. 561, it being admitted that both the plaintiff and the defendant were citizens of Tennessee at the time the suit was brought. Affirmed.