The United States v. Barker, 4 L. Ed. 271 (1817). · Go Syfert
Search
The United States v. Barker, 4 L. Ed. 271 (1817). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
130 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 52 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bronx Household of Faith v. Bd. of Educ. (ca2, 2007-07-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1902 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1902 1964 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Bronx Household of Faith v. Bd. of Educ.
2d Cir. · 2007 · signal: cf. · confidence medium
Cf. Lamb’s Chapel, 508 15 U.S. at 395.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ideco Division of Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Chance Drilling Company, Inc., Small Business Administration, Impleaded
5th Cir. · 1970 · confidence medium
Co., 26 U.S. 386 , 7 L.Ed. 189 (1828); Thelusson v. Smith, 15 U.S. 396 , 4 L.Ed. 271, 278 (1817); United States v. Fisher, 6 U.S. 358 , 2 L.Ed. 304 (1804); United States v. Haddix & Sons, Inc., 249 F.Supp. 88 (E.D.Mich.1965); United States v. Menier Hardware No. 1, Inc., 219 F.Supp. 448 (W.D.Tex.1963). 6 . 363 U.S. 509 , 80 S.Ct. 1277 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1365 (I960),; 363 U.S. 522 , 80 S.Ct. 1282 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1371 (1960). 7 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) W. T. Jones & Co. v. Foodco Realty, Inc.
W.D. Va. · 1962 · confidence medium
In Thelusson v. Smith, 2 Wheat., p. 396, 4 L.Ed. 271 the court said: “The United States is to be first satisfied; but then it must be out of the debtor’s estate.
cited Cited "see" Nesbitt v. United States
N.D. Cal. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Thelusson v. Smith, 2 Wheat. 396 , 15 U.S. 396 , 4 L.Ed. 271 (1817).
cited Cited "see, e.g." W. T. Jones and Company, Incorporated, and Noland Company, Inc., and Marvin Moseley v. Foodco Realty, Inc., and United States of America
4th Cir. · 1963 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Thelusson v. Smith, 2 Wheat. 396 , 4 L.Ed. 271 (1817); New York v. Maclay, 288 U. S. 290, 293-294 ; 53 S.Ct. 323 , 77 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The United States
v.
Barker
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 15, 1817.
4 L. Ed. 271
Cited by 34 opinions  |  Published

15 U.S. 395

4 L.Ed. 271

2 Wheat. 395

The UNITED STATES
v.
BARKER.

February Term, 1817

March 15th.

Mr. Balduin, for the plaintiffs in error, moved to dismiss the writ of error in this case, as having been improvidently allowed, the cause having been carried up from the district to the circuit court of New-York by writ of error and, according to the former decisions of this court, a writ of error does not lie to carry to this court a civil cause which has been carried from the district to the circuit court by writ of error.[a]

Mr. D. B. Ogden, for the defendant, moved for costs.

[Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL.

[*~271]1

The United States never pay costs.]

[*~318]2

Writ of error dismissed without costs.

a

United States v. Goodwin, 7 Cranch, 108. United States v. Gordon, Id. 287. The United States v. Ten Broek, ante, p. 248.