Int'l Textbook Co. v. Peterson, 218 U.S. 664 (1910). · Go Syfert
Search
Int'l Textbook Co. v. Peterson, 218 U.S. 664 (1910). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Easterday v. McCarthy (ca2, 1919-02-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1910 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1910 1968 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Easterday v. McCarthy
2d Cir. · 1919 · confidence medium
C.) 180 Fed. 240 , affirmed 218 U. S. 665 , 31 Sup. Ct. 222, 54 L.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Zulch v. Roach
Wyo. · 1915 · confidence medium
Now, if it shall be proved that a conspiracy was entered into by Mr. Ploffstot, and circumstantial evidence shall be offered sufficient to authorize a jury to draw the inference that he was present in Pennsylvania when any act material in carrying out the objects of the conspiracy was done, I think he would properly be held to have beeil within the State of Pennsylvania at the time that the crime charged, in the indictment was committed, and that his subsequent return from that state to New York would render him a fugitive from justice within the meaning of the United States Constitution and s…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
INTERNATIONAL TEXTBOOK COMPANY
v.
PETERSON. SAME v. LYNCH.
3.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 1910.
218 U.S. 664
Published
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF VERMONT.

Mr. David C. Harrington for plaintiff in error.

No briefs filed for defendants in error.

Per Curiam:

Substantially the same question of Federal law involved in these two cases arose under a Kansas statute in International Textbook Co. v. Pigg, 217 U.S. 91; and the Federal right asserted in that case was sustained. There is no difference in principle between the two cases last named and the Pigg case, although the Federal question involved in them arises under the statutes, respectively, of other States — Wisconsin and Vermont. In view of the pleadings and the conceded facts in these cases the judgment in each of them must be reversed on the authority of the Pigg case, and the cases are severally remanded for such further proceedings as is required by and is not inconsistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.