Barber & Co. v. S.S. \Knutsford, 252 U.S. 586 (1920). · Go Syfert
Barber & Co. v. S.S. \Knutsford, 252 U.S. 586 (1920). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Maldonado v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co. (texapp, 1940-05-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Maldonado v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co.
Tex. App. · 1940 · confidence medium
Further, under the requirements of that Act, it being amendatory of the preexisting Federal Admiralty Law, the common law rules do not apply to such relationship of ship-owner and seaman, among other things, in that the seamen are bound to use the equipment or appliances which the owners furnish for them to do the particular work with, and, in turn, the owners are, for their part, bound to furnish and maintain equipment and appliances reasonably free from defects, as well as reasonably proper and suitable for the special kind of work being done; in this respect, such employers of seamen, while…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
\" Ltd."
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 19, 1920.
252 U.S. 586
U

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.