green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1928 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1928
1977
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
US Steel Min. Co., LLC v. Helton
(2×)
Spalding & Bros. v. Edwards, 262 U.S. 66, 69 , 43 S.Ct. 485, 486 , 67 L.Ed. 865, 867 (1923) (goods became exempt exports "after they had been loaded".) Richfield Oil, 329 U.S. at 79-81 , 67 S.Ct. at 161-63 , 91 L.Ed. at 91-92 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Shoe Corporation v. United States
(2×)
See id. (holding unconstitutional a tax on baseball bats and balls imposed on “[t]he very act that passed the title and that would have incurred the tax had the transaction been domestic, [and that] committed the goods to the earner that was to take them across the sea, for the purpose of export and with the direction to the foreign port upon the goods.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Shoe Corp. v. United States
(2×)
See id. at 69-70 , 43 S.Ct. at 486 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Mossel; United States v. Milford
v.
Mossel; United States v. Milford
372, 373.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 23, 1923.
Mr. James A. Fowler, Special Assistant to the Attorney-General, with whom Mr. Solicitor General Beck was on the brief, for the United States., Mr. George A. King, with whom Mr. William B. King and Mr. George R. Shields were on the brief, for appellees.
McKenna.
Published
Mr. Justice McKenna
delivered the judgment of the Court.
Under stipulation of counsel, filed in the Clerk’s Office, the above cases are submitted on the record as printed in United States v. Luskey, No. 371, just decided, ante, 62, “ it being agreed by counsel that they shall be controlled by the decision in that case.”
Therefore, upon its authority, the judgments in these cases are
Affirmed.