green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
2.2 score
“in view of the delays and obstructions that it is possible for persons accused to obtain and interpose by misuse of the right to be heard before removal, section 1014 is to be construed quite favorably to the government's applications.”
Treatment trajectory · 1934 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1934
1980
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Saldana-Beltran
in view of the delays and obstructions that it is possible for persons accused to obtain and interpose by misuse of the right to be heard before removal, section 1014 is to be construed quite favorably to the government's applications.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marvin Smith and James Smith
See also, United States ex rel, Kassin v. Mulligan, 295 U.S. 396, 400 , 55 S.Ct. 781 , 79 L.Ed. 1501 , and Goldsby v. United States, 160 U.S. 70, 73 , 16 S.Ct. 216 , 40 L.Ed. 343 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
TEXAS & NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD CO. Et Al.
v.
UNITED STATES Et Al.
v.
UNITED STATES Et Al.
670.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 1935.
Mr. Robert Wilkins Thompson, with whom Messrs. Jules Henri Tallichet and T. D. Gresham were on the brief, for appellants., Mr. Nelson Thomas, with whom Solictor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Stephens, and Messrs. Elmer B. Collins and Daniel W. Knowlton were on the brief, for the United States et al.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. California (1)
Pee Curiam.
This is a suit to restrain the enforcement of two orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission, made July 24, 1933, and December 11, 1933, respectively, relating to rates for the transportation of horses and mules, in carloads, in southwestern territory. 195 I. C. C. 417. Upon the hearing by the District Court, composed of three judges, the application for an injunction was denied and the amended bill of complaint was dismissed.
This Court, upon an examination of the record, agrees with the conclusion of the District Court that the orders in question were sustained by findings of the Commission acting within its statutory authority and that these findings were adequately supported by evidence. The decree is
Affirmed.