green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1935 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1935
1980
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Israel-British Bank (London) Ltd. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See In re Union Guarantee & Mortgage Co., 75 F.2d 984 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 296 U.S. 594 , 56 S.Ct. 142 , 80 L.Ed. 421 (1935); Woolsey v. Security Trust Co., 74 F.2d 334, 337 (5 Cir. 1934); In re Equity Funding Corp. of America, 396 F.Supp. 1266, 1275 (C.D.Cal.1975); In re Supreme Lodge of the Masons Annuity, 286 F. 180, 184 (N.D.Ga.1923).
discussed
Cited "see"
In The Matter Of Israel-British Bank (London) Limited
See In re Union Guarantee & Mortgage Co., 75 F.2d 984 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 296 U.S. 594 , 56 S.Ct. 142 , 80 L.Ed. 421 (1935); Woolsey v. Security Trust Co., 74 F.2d 334, 337 (5 Cir. 1934); In re Equity Funding Corp. of America, 396 F.Supp. 1266, 1275 (C.D.Cal.1975); In re Supreme Lodge of the Masons Annuity, 286 F. 180, 184 (N.D.Ga.1923). 23 So far as Congressional policy can be found for the exclusion of "banking corporations" from the benefit of the Bankruptcy Act, it is this.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor (Brookland Garage). On Notice of Intent to Turn Over Possession of Brookland Garage Property
MORTGAGEE'S RIGHTS TO RECEIVE RENTS 23 It is a long standing rule in the District of Columbia "that where the mortgagor is permitted to remain in possession of the property, he is entitled to receive the rents even after default and even though the land, when sold, should be insufficient to pay the debt." Totten v. Harlowe, 90 F.2d 377, 380 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 301 U.S. 711 , 57 S.Ct. 945 , 81 L.Ed. 1364 (1937); see also Hardee v. American Sec. & Trust Co., 77 F.2d 382 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 296 U.S. 595 , 56 S.Ct. 110 , 80 L.Ed. 421 (1935); In re 1301 Connecticut Ave.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
MORTGAGEE’S RIGHTS TO RECEIVE RENTS It is a long standing rule in the District of Columbia “that where the mortgagor is permitted to remain in possession of the property, he is entitled to receive the rents even after default and even though the land, when sold, should be insufficient to pay the debt.” Totten v. Harlowe, 90 F.2d 377, 380 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 301 U.S. 711 , 57 S.Ct. 945 , 81 L.Ed. 1364 (1937); see also Hardee v. American Sec. & Trust Co., 77 F.2d 382 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 296 U.S. 595 , 56 S.Ct. 110 , 80 L.Ed. 421 (1935); In re 1301 Connecticut Ave.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Matalone
v.
Peoria Life Insurance Co.
v.
Peoria Life Insurance Co.
No. 188.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1935.
Mr. Tom D. McKeown for petitioners., Messrs. Montgomery S. Winning, J. B. Wolfenbarger, and George W. Hunt for respondents.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.