E. S.S. Lines, Inc. v. Mulligan, 338 U.S. 801 (1949). · Go Syfert
Search
E. S.S. Lines, Inc. v. Mulligan, 338 U.S. 801 (1949). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events across 22 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: C & H Transportation Co. v. United States (txnd, 1965-12-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." C & H Transportation Co. v. United States
N.D. Tex. · 1965 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. v. United States, 82 F.Supp. 153 (S.D.N.Y.1948), aff’d per curiam, 338 U.S. 802 , 70 S.Ct. 59 , 94 L.Ed. 485 (1949)..
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eastern Steamship Lines, Inc.
v.
Mulligan, Public Administrator
No. 89.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1949.
338 U.S. 801
Arthur M. Boal for petitioner. George J. Engelman for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for disposition in the light of Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllister, 337 U. S. 783.