Dist. of Columbia v. Little, 338 U.S. 866 (1949). · Go Syfert
Dist. of Columbia v. Little, 338 U.S. 866 (1949). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Ritter (wis, 1976-11-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951 1988 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Ritter
Wis. · 1976 · confidence medium
Mattox v. Superintendent (1943), 152 Pa. Super. 167 , 31 Atl.2d 576 ; Johnson v. Dye (3d Cir. 1949), 175 Fed.2d 250, rev’d on procedural grounds, 338 U.S. 864 , 70 Sup. Ct. 146, 94 L.
discussed Cited "see" Sutherland v. Love
E.D. Ark. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dye v. Johnson, 1949, 338 U.S. 864 , 70 S.Ct. 146 , 94 L.Ed. 530 ; Giles v. Merrill, 10 Cir., 1963, 322 F.2d 786 ; Tickle v. Summers, 4 Cir., 1959, 270 F.2d 848 ; Davis v. O’Connell, 8 Cir., 1951, 185 F.2d 513 .
cited Cited "see" National Labor Relations Board v. New England Upholstery Co., Inc.
1st Cir. · 1959 · signal: see · confidence high
See Western Union Division Commercial Telegraphers’ Union, A. F. of L. v. United States, D.C.1949, 87 F.Supp. 324, 333 , affirmed 338 U.S. 864 , 70 S.Ct. 148 , 94 L.Ed. 530 .
discussed Cited "see" In re Brabson
S.D.N.Y. · 1958 · signal: see · confidence high
See Johnson v. Dye, 3 Cir., 175 F.2d 250 , reversed on other grounds, 1949, 338 U.S. 864 , 70 S.Ct. 146 , 94 L.Ed. 530 ; Coffin v. Reichard, 6 Cir., 1944, 143 F.2d 443 , 155 A.L.R. 143 ; Thompson v. Cavell, D.C.W.D.Pa.1957, 158 F.Supp. 19 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
District of Columbia
v.
Little
No. 302.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 1949.
338 U.S. 866
Vernon E. West, Chester H. Gray, Lee F. Dante and Edward A. Beard for petitioner. John P. McGrath, Ray L. Chesebro, Benjamin S. Adamowski, Alexander G. Brown and Charles S. Rhyne filed a brief for the National Institute of Municipal Law Officers, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.