green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Dale Reese, United States of America v. Scott Matthew Dwyer, United States of America v. Daniel Wayne Broussard, United States of America v. Larry Marcel Houston
(2×)
See Lynch v. United States, 189 F.2d 476, 479 (5th Cir.) (recognizing "the right of protection due the prisoner by the arresting officers" against harm from other officers and third parties alike), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 831 , 72 S.Ct. 50 , 96 L.Ed. 629 (1951); Catlette v. United States, 132 F.2d 902 (4th Cir.1943) (holding that "the failure of Catlette to protect the victims from group violence" after they were taken into custody "comes squarely within the provisions of" the predecessor to Sec. 242). 22 In our own cases, meanwhile, we have similarly recognized that an individual constitutiona…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Reese
(2×)
See Lynch v. United States, 189 F.2d 476, 479 (5th Cir.) (recognizing “the right of protection due the prisoner by the arresting officers” against harm from other officers and third parties alike), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 831 , 72 S.Ct. 50 , 96 L.Ed. 629 (1951); Catlette v. United States, 132 F.2d 902 (4th Cir.1943) (holding that “the failure of Catlette to protect the victims from group violence” after they were taken into custody “comes squarely within the provisions of’ the predecessor to § 242). 22 In our own cases, meanwhile, we have similarly recognized that an individual con…
cited
Cited "see"
Atari, Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp.
See Hunter v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Railway Co., 188 F.2d 294, 298-99 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 819 , 72 S.Ct. 36 , 96 L.Ed. 619 (1951).
cited
Cited "see"
Atari, Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp.
See Hunter v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Railway Co., 188 F.2d 294, 298-99 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 819 , 72 S.Ct. 36 , 96 L.Ed. 619 (1951).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zahn v. International Paper Co.
See generally Mc- Grath v. Tadayasu Abo, 186 F.2d 766, 770-771 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 832 , 72 S.Ct. 38 , 96 L.Ed. 629 (1951); Knowles v. War Damage Corp., 83 U.S. App.D.C. 388, 171 F.2d 15, 18 (1948), cert. denied, 336 U.S. 914 , 69 S.Ct. 604 , 93 L.Ed. 1077 (1949); Hackner v. Guaranty Trust Co., 117 F.2d 95, 97 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 313 U.S. 559 , 61 S.Ct. 835 , 85 L.Ed. 1520 (1941); Mutation Mink Breeders Ass’n v. Lou Nierenberg Corp., 23 F.R.D. 155, 162 (S.D.N.Y.1959).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Moses
(2×)
Further, in State v. Brown, 335 N.C. 477 , 439 S.E.2d 589 (1994), this Court held: “[W]here evidence of bias is elicited on cross-examination the witness is entitled to explain, if he can, on redirect examination, the circumstances giving rise to bias so that the witness may stand in a fair and just light before the jury.” State v. Patterson, 284 N.C. 190, 196 , 200 S.E.2d 16, 20 (1973); see also State v. Hicks, 233 N.C. 511 , 64 S.E.2d 871 , cert. denied, 342 U.S. 831 , 96 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brown
(2×)
We disagree. “[W]here evidence of bias is elicited on cross-examination the witness is entitled to explain, if he can, on redirect examination, the circumstances giving rise to bias so that the witness may stand in a fair and just light before the jury.” State v. Patterson, 284 N.C. 190, 196 , 200 S.E.2d 16, 20 (1973); see also State v. Hicks, 233 N.C. 511 , 64 S.E.2d 871 , cert. denied, 342 U.S. 831 , 96 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blocker v. Board of Education of Manhasset, New York
(2×)
See also Jackson v. Pasadena City School District, *227 supra. Cf. Lynch v. United States, 189 F.2d 476, 479 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 831 , 72 S.Ct. 50 , 96 L.Ed. 629 (1951); Catlette v. United States, 132 F.2d 902, 907 (4th Cir. 1943).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Neapolidis
v.
Theofana Maritime Co., Ltd.
v.
Theofana Maritime Co., Ltd.
No. 102.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1951.
Jacob L. Morewitz for petitioners., Leon T. Seawell and Harry E. McCoy, Jr. for respondents.
Published
Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Certiorari denied.