green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Clay v. Ensco Offshore Co.
See Drachenberg, 571 F.2d at 920 (noting that the Supreme Court has in effect found that a landfall runner, brought aboard by a stevedore company and attached to the ship only by way of one of the ship’s winches, was an appurtenance of the vessel) (citing Rogers v. United States Lines, 347 U.S. 984 , 74 S.Ct. 849 , 98 L.Ed. 1120 (1954) (per curiam)).
cited
Cited "see"
Capitol Industries-Emi, Inc. v. William M. Bennett, Kenneth Cory, Richard Silberman, Individually and Asmembers Of, and Martin Huff, Individually, and as Executive Officer Of, Thefranchise Tax Board, State of California, Emi Limited v. William M. Bennett, Kenneth Cory, Richard Silberman, Individually and Asmembers Of, and Martin Huff, Individually and as Executive Officer Of, Thefranchise Tax Board, State of California
See George F. Alger Co. v. Peck, 347 U.S. 984 , 74 S.Ct. 605 , 98 L.Ed. 1120 (1954).
cited
Cited "see"
Capitol Industries-EMI, Inc. v. Bennett
See George F. Alger Co. v. Peck, 347 U.S. 984 , 74 S.Ct. 605 , 98 L.Ed. 1120 (1954).
cited
Cited "see"
Joseph Chagois, Cross-Appellant v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Company, Inc., Cross-Appellee
See Rogers *395 v. United States Lines, 1954, 347 U.S. 984 , 74 S.Ct. 849 , 98 L.Ed. 1120 , rev’g 3 Cir. 1953, 205 F.2d 57 ; Alaska S.S.
cited
Cited "see"
Joseph Chagois, Cross-Appellant v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Company, Inc., Cross-Appellee
See Rogers v. United States Lines, 1954, 347 U.S. 984 , 74 S.Ct. 849 , 98 L.Ed. 1120 , rev'g 3 Cir. 1953, 205 F.2d 57 ; Alaska S.S.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hamilton v. MARINE CARRIERS CORPORATION
See also, Rogers v. United States Lines, 347 U.S. 984 , 74 S.Ct. 849 , 98 L.Ed. 1120 (1954). 11 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
William Norfleet and David Lane v. Isthmian Lines, Inc., Isthmian Lines, Inc., and Third-Party v. Whitehall Terminal Corporation, Third-Party
See also, Rogers v. United States Lines, 347 U.S. 984 , 74 S.Ct. 849 , 98 L.Ed. 1120 (1954); Alaska S.S.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reid v. Quebec Paper Sales & Transportation Co.
See Grillea v. United States, 232 F.2d 919 (2 Cir. 1956); see also Rogers v. United States Lines, 347 U.S. 984 , 74 S.Ct. 849 , 98 L.Ed. 1120 (1954) and Alaska Steamship Co., Inc. v. Petterson, 347 U.S. 396 , 74 S.Ct. 601 , 98 L.Ed. 798 (1954) (to the effect that when a stevedore brings aboard the ship defective equipment which causes an accident the ship is made unseaworthy).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hubert Reid, Libelant-Appellee v. Quebec Paper Sales & Transportation Company, Limited and Donnacona Paper Company, Limited v. William Spencer & Son Corp., Respondent-Impleaded
See Grillea v. United States, 232 F.2d 919 (2 Cir. 1956); see also Rogers v. United States Lines, 347 U.S. 984 , 74 S.Ct. 849 , 98 L.Ed. 1120 (1954) and Alaska Steamship Co., Inc. v. Petterson, 347 U.S. 396 , 74 S.Ct. 601 , 98 L.Ed. 798 (1954) (to the effect that when a stevedore brings aboard the ship defective equipment which causes an accident the ship is made unseaworthy).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wyborski Ex Rel. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Bristol City Line of Steamships, Ltd.
For instance, in the Petterson case, supra, the faulty appurtenance was in fact brought on board the ship by the stevedores, as also in the Casbon case, supra; see also Rogers v. United States Lines, 1954, 347 U.S. 984 , 74 S.Ct. 849 , 98 L.Ed. 1120 , per curiam reversal of 3d Circuit, 205 F.2d 57 ; Crumady v. The J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beyerbach
v.
Juno Oil Co.
v.
Juno Oil Co.
No. 741.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1954.
A. P. G. Steffes and George H. Zeutzius for appellant., Harry E. Templeton for appellees.
Published
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.