green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Del Percio
Accord, Butzman v. United States, 205 F.2d 343, 351 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 828 , 74 S.Ct. 50 , 98 L.Ed. 353 (1953).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewis F. Stevens and Elvira B. Stevens v. F/v Bonnie Doon, Her Engines, MacHinery Tackle, Etc. Gene Koblick, an Individual
See United States v. Shipowners & Merchants Tugboat Co., 103 F.Supp. 152, 153 (N.D.Cal.1952), affd, 205 F.2d 352 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 829 , 74 S.Ct. 51 , 98 L.Ed. 353 (1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
JC Penney Co., Inc. v. Hardesty
See Gross Income Tax Division v. Surface Combustion Corp., 232 Ind. 100 , 111 N.E.2d 50 (1953), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 829 , 829-30, 74 S.Ct. 51 , 52, 98 L.Ed. 353 , 354. [7] Note 1 in Standard Pressed Steel Co. v. Washington Department of Revenue, 419 U.S. 560, 562 , 95 S.Ct. 706, 708 , 42 L.Ed.2d 719, 722 (1975), states that the amount of the tax at issue was $33,444.91.
cited
Cited "see"
J. C. Penney Co. v. Haradesty
See Gross Income Tax Division v. Surface Combustion Corp., 232 Ind. 100 , 111 N.E.2d 50 (1953), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 829 , 829-30, 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hagan
See Butzman v. United States, 205 F.2d 343 (6 Cir. 1963), cert. den. 346 U.S. 828 , 74 S.Ct. 50 , 98 L.Ed. 353 (1963), and United States v. Horwitz, 247 F.Supp. 412 (N.D.Ill.1965), which held that the statute of limitations for the offense charged does not begin to run until the return is filed.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel J. Koenig and Charles Forest Waugaman, United States of America v. Daniel J. Koenig, United States of America v. Charles Forest Waugaman
See Butzman v. United States, 205 F.2d 343, 350 (C.A. 6), certiorari denied 346 U.S. 828 , 74 S.Ct. 50 , 98 L.Ed. 353 ; Spaeth v. United States, 254 F.2d 924 (C.A. 6), certiorari denied 358 U.S. 831 , 79 S.Ct. 52 , 3 L.Ed.2d 69 . 6 That the trial court did not commit an abuse of discretion in denying the motion for continuance is supported by the principles of the following cases, among others: Rogers v. United States, 128 F.2d 973, 974 (C.A. 5); Franken v. United States, 248 F.2d 789, 790 (C.A. 4), certiorari denied355 U.S. 956, 78 S.Ct. 541 , 2 L.Ed.2d 532 ; United States v. Moran, 194 F.2d …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Koenig
See Butzman v. United States, 205 F.2d 343, 350 (C.A. 6), certiorari denied 346 U.S. 828 , 74 S.Ct. 50 , 98 L.Ed. 353 ; Spaeth v. United States, 254 F.2d 924 (C.A. 6), certiorari denied 358 U.S. 831 , 79 S.Ct. 52 , 3 L.Ed.2d 69 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., Gross Income Tax Div. v. Surface Combustion Corp. (1953), 232 Ind. 100 , 111 N.E.2d 50 , cert. denied, 346 U.S. 829 , 74 S.Ct. 51 , 98 L.Ed. 353 ; Indiana Dep't of State Revenue v. Convenient Indus. of Am. (1973), 157 Ind. App. 179 , 299 N.E.2d 641 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Butzman
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 231.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1953.
Michael Leo Looney for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Holland, Ellis N. Slack and Fred G. Folsom for the United States.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.